From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Brian Song <hibriansong@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com,
bernd@bsbernd.com, fam@euphon.net, hreitz@redhat.com,
kwolf@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] export/fuse: Add FUSE-over-io_uring for Storage Exports
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 11:49:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250903094907.GA106431@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKWCU7VusNOUskuxc3RMTd+aLY6bSX+de-LiUhe9xpdmbzkn-Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2424 bytes --]
On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 08:00:00AM -0400, Brian Song wrote:
> We used fio to test a 1 GB file under both traditional FUSE and
> FUSE-over-io_uring modes. The experiments were conducted with the
> following iodepth and numjobs configurations: 1-1, 64-1, 1-4, and 64-4,
> with 70% read and 30% write, resulting in a total of eight test cases,
> measuring both latency and throughput.
>
> Test results:
>
> https://gist.github.com/hibriansong/a4849903387b297516603e83b53bbde4
Hanna: You benchmarked the FUSE export coroutine implementation a little
while ago. What do you think about these results with
FUSE-over-io_uring?
What stands out to me is that iodepth=1 numjobs=4 already saturates the
system, so increasing iodepth to 64 does not improve the results much.
Brian: What is the qemu-storage-daemon command-line for the benchmark
and what are the details of /mnt/tmp/ (e.g. a preallocated 10 GB file
with an XFS file system mounted from the FUSE image)?
Thanks,
Stefan
>
>
>
>
> On 8/29/25 10:50 PM, Brian Song wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a GSoC project. More details are available here:
> > https://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2025#FUSE-over-io_uring_exports
> >
> > This patch series includes:
> > - Add a round-robin mechanism to distribute the kernel-required Ring
> > Queues to FUSE Queues
> > - Support multiple in-flight requests (multiple ring entries)
> > - Add tests for FUSE-over-io_uring
> >
> > More detail in the v2 cover letter:
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2025-08/msg00140.html
> >
> > And in the v1 cover letter:
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2025-07/msg00280.html
> >
> >
> > Brian Song (4):
> > export/fuse: add opt to enable FUSE-over-io_uring
> > export/fuse: process FUSE-over-io_uring requests
> > export/fuse: Safe termination for FUSE-uring
> > iotests: add tests for FUSE-over-io_uring
> >
> > block/export/fuse.c | 838 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> > docs/tools/qemu-storage-daemon.rst | 11 +-
> > qapi/block-export.json | 5 +-
> > storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon.c | 1 +
> > tests/qemu-iotests/check | 2 +
> > tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc | 45 +-
> > util/fdmon-io_uring.c | 5 +-
> > 7 files changed, 717 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-)
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-03 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-30 2:50 [PATCH 0/4] export/fuse: Add FUSE-over-io_uring for Storage Exports Brian Song
2025-08-30 2:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] export/fuse: add opt to enable FUSE-over-io_uring Brian Song
2025-09-03 10:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-03 18:00 ` Brian Song
2025-09-09 14:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-09 17:46 ` Brian Song
2025-09-09 18:05 ` Bernd Schubert
2025-09-03 11:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-16 19:08 ` Kevin Wolf
2025-09-17 19:47 ` Brian Song
2025-09-19 14:13 ` Kevin Wolf
2025-08-30 2:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] export/fuse: process FUSE-over-io_uring requests Brian Song
2025-09-03 11:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-08 19:09 ` Brian Song
2025-09-08 19:45 ` Bernd Schubert
2025-09-09 1:10 ` Brian Song
2025-09-09 15:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-19 13:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2025-08-30 2:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] export/fuse: Safe termination for FUSE-uring Brian Song
2025-09-09 19:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-09 20:51 ` Brian Song
2025-09-10 13:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-15 5:43 ` Brian Song
2025-09-17 13:01 ` Hanna Czenczek
2025-09-17 22:06 ` Brian Song
2025-09-22 17:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-22 17:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-08-30 2:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] iotests: add tests for FUSE-over-io_uring Brian Song
2025-09-09 19:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-09 20:51 ` Brian Song
2025-09-10 13:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-09-12 2:22 ` Brian Song
2025-09-15 17:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-08-30 12:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] export/fuse: Add FUSE-over-io_uring for Storage Exports Brian Song
2025-09-03 9:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2025-09-03 18:11 ` Brian Song
2025-09-16 12:18 ` Kevin Wolf
2025-09-04 19:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250903094907.GA106431@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hibriansong@gmail.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).