From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40476CAC586 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uvcNb-0003xU-JP; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 09:57:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uvcNa-0003wK-7E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 09:57:58 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uvcNI-0005cW-Io for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 09:57:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1757339854; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jJDQQvbkZxsfe7NtdZ5qO3AzCf/mQQymPIQejFCXCkI=; b=GGtov4tdOuDpfRMfSZuBNrqSaIBkhXloVYmLgS4ZdxhSaHd/k+gZY4r41Kpiq8NdohVPps RMWbAyOpj4lMjuXTBUT2vmOn5ZndYVujph7T6OVuSDIoLkJKaYr4LbjPftpH7c9ZXwA/Qw ea0kCycDQYrbzlDJhIT0p7lWDUtM1mg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-472-OgpYZf0POiyiDxp7W7iPmg-1; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 09:57:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OgpYZf0POiyiDxp7W7iPmg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: OgpYZf0POiyiDxp7W7iPmg_1757339849 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E25F195609F; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toolbx.redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.93]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C6618003FC; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:57:27 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: [PATCH 2/4] tests/functional: avoid duplicate messages on failures Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 14:57:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20250908135722.3375580-3-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250908135722.3375580-1-berrange@redhat.com> References: <20250908135722.3375580-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org In some scenarios the same tests is mentioned in both the 'res.results.errors' and 'res.results.failures' array returned by unittest.main(). This was seen when the 'tearDown' method raised an exception. In such a case, we printed out the same information about where to find a log file twice for each test. Track which tests we have already reported on, to avoid the duplication. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé --- tests/functional/qemu_test/testcase.py | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/functional/qemu_test/testcase.py b/tests/functional/qemu_test/testcase.py index fbeb171058..82a7724404 100644 --- a/tests/functional/qemu_test/testcase.py +++ b/tests/functional/qemu_test/testcase.py @@ -251,13 +251,14 @@ def main(): test_output_log = pycotap.LogMode.LogToError) res = unittest.main(module = None, testRunner = tr, exit = False, argv=[sys.argv[0], path] + sys.argv[1:]) + failed = {} for (test, message) in res.result.errors + res.result.failures: - - if hasattr(test, "log_filename"): + if hasattr(test, "log_filename") and not test.id() in failed: print('More information on ' + test.id() + ' could be found here:' '\n %s' % test.log_filename, file=sys.stderr) if hasattr(test, 'console_log_name'): print(' %s' % test.console_log_name, file=sys.stderr) + failed[test.id()] = True sys.exit(not res.result.wasSuccessful()) -- 2.50.1