From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Juraj Marcin" <jmarcin@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bql: Fix bql_locked status with condvar APIs
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 14:24:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250908182453.GD167158@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904223158.1276992-1-peterx@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1464 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 06:31:58PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> QEMU has a per-thread "bql_locked" variable stored in TLS section, showing
> whether the current thread is holding the BQL lock.
>
> It's a pretty handy variable. Function-wise, QEMU have codes trying to
> conditionally take bql, relying on the var reflecting the locking status
> (e.g. BQL_LOCK_GUARD), or in a GDB debugging session, we could also look at
> the variable (in reality, co_tls_bql_locked), to see which thread is
> currently holding the bql.
>
> When using that as a debugging facility, sometimes we can observe multiple
> threads holding bql at the same time. It's because QEMU's condvar APIs
> bypassed the bql_*() API, hence they do not update bql_locked even if they
> have released the mutex while waiting.
>
> It can cause confusion if one does "thread apply all p co_tls_bql_locked"
> and see multiple threads reporting true.
>
> Fix this by moving the bql status updates into the mutex debug hooks. Now
> the variable should always reflect the reality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
> rfc->v1
> - Fix comment [Stefan]
> ---
> include/qemu/main-loop.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> util/qemu-thread-common.h | 7 +++++++
> stubs/iothread-lock.c | 9 +++++++++
> system/cpus.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 22:31 [PATCH] bql: Fix bql_locked status with condvar APIs Peter Xu
2025-09-08 18:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2025-09-22 7:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-09 9:21 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250908182453.GD167158@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).