From: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Harsh Prateek Bora" <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>,
Mike Kowal <kowal@linux.ibm.com>,
Miles Glenn <milesg@linux.ibm.com>,
Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
<qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH v10 0/8] Power11 support for QEMU [PowerNV]
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 23:00:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925173049.891406-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Overview
============
Add support for Power11 powernv machine type.
As Power11 core is same as Power10, hence much of the code has been reused
from Power10.
Power11 PSeries already added in QEMU in:
commit 273db89bcaf4 ("ppc/pseries: Add Power11 cpu type")
Git Tree for Testing
====================
QEMU: https://github.com/adi-g15-ibm/qemu/tree/p11-powernv-v10
The patches apply cleanly on below commit:
95b9e0d2ade5 ("Merge tag 'for-upstream' of https://gitlab.com/bonzini/qemu into staging")
Tests ran:
* `make check`
* '-M powernv' / '-M powernv10' / '-M powernv11'
* '-smp' option tested
* 'e1000e' device
* tested changing irq affinities to remote chips for xive functionality
* compile test with --without-default-devices
skiboot with Power11 support: https://github.com/open-power/skiboot, since
commit 785a5e3
Linux with Power11 support: https://github.com/torvalds/linux, since v6.9-rc1
Changelog
=========
v10:
+ [PATCH 1/8]: Do same change for Power11 as done for Power10 in commit 46d03b,
as changes required for successful build with --without-default-devices
+ [PATCH 3/8]: Added new patch to remove assuming chip as Power10 in xive2
+ rebase to upstream
v9 (https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250808115929.1073910-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com/):
+ [PATCH 1/7]: apply hunks from commit cf0eb929e59cb, and commit
24c8fa968a6d8, for changes that were done for Power10, as those changes
make sense for Power11 also
+ [PATCH 3/7]: fixed build breakage identified with QEMU CI, due to changes
in upstream function pointer types
v8 (https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250608182842.2717225-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com/):
+ rebase to upstream
+ propose myself as a powernv reviewer
v7 (https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250327200738.1524401-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com/):
+ use Power10 models of homer, sbe, occ, psi, lpc. As they are same.
+ switch powernv tests to use buildroot images instead of op-build images
+ add functional test for powernv11
- remove dynamic sysbus device for PHBs, so no more dynamic number of
PHBs in Power11 as it became complex to handle it and not much used
v6 (https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250325112319.927190-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com/):
+ make Pnv11Chip's parent as PnvChip, instead of Pnv10Chip
+ rebase on upstream/master
v5 (https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/57ce8d50-db92-44f0-96a9-e1297eea949f@kaod.org/):
+ add chiptod
+ add instance_init for P11 to use P11 models
+ move patch introducing Pnv11Chip to the last
+ update skiboot.lid to skiboot's upstream/master
v4:
+ patch #5: fix memory leak in pnv_chip_power10_quad_realize
- no change in other patches
v3:
+ patch #1: version power11 as power11_v2.0
+ patch #2: split target hw/pseries code into patch #2
+ patch #3,#4: fix regression due to Power10 and Power11 having same PCR
+ patch #5: create pnv_chip_power11_dt_populate and split pnv_chip_power10_common_realize as per review
+ patch #6-#11: no change
- remove commit to make Power11 as default
v2:
+ split powernv patch into homer,lpc,occ,psi,sbe
+ reduce code duplication by reusing power10 code
+ make power11 as default
+ rebase on qemu upstream/master
+ add more information in commit descriptions
+ update docs
+ update skiboot.lid
Aditya Gupta (8):
ppc/pnv: Introduce Pnv11Chip
ppc/pnv: Introduce Power11 PowerNV machine
ppc/pnv: Add PnvChipClass handler to get reference to interrupt
controller
ppc/pnv: Add XIVE2 controller to Power11
ppc/pnv: Add PHB5 PCIe Host bridge to Power11
ppc/pnv: Add ChipTOD model for Power11
tests/powernv: Switch to buildroot images instead of op-build
tests/powernv: Add PowerNV test for Power11
docs/system/ppc/powernv.rst | 9 +-
hw/intc/pnv_xive2.c | 4 +-
hw/ppc/pnv.c | 560 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/ppc/pnv_chiptod.c | 59 +++
hw/ppc/pnv_core.c | 17 +
include/hw/ppc/pnv.h | 38 ++
include/hw/ppc/pnv_chip.h | 8 +
include/hw/ppc/pnv_chiptod.h | 2 +
include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h | 49 +++
tests/functional/ppc64/test_powernv.py | 34 +-
10 files changed, 760 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
2.50.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 17:30 Aditya Gupta [this message]
2025-09-25 17:30 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] ppc/pnv: Introduce Pnv11Chip Aditya Gupta
2025-10-06 15:45 ` Mike Kowal
2025-10-06 18:24 ` Aditya Gupta
2025-10-07 5:40 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-25 17:30 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] ppc/pnv: Introduce Power11 PowerNV machine Aditya Gupta
2025-10-06 15:45 ` Mike Kowal
2025-09-25 17:30 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] ppc/pnv: Add PnvChipClass handler to get reference to interrupt controller Aditya Gupta
2025-09-25 21:02 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-27 13:25 ` Aditya Gupta
2025-10-06 15:46 ` Mike Kowal
2025-09-25 17:30 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] ppc/pnv: Add XIVE2 controller to Power11 Aditya Gupta
2025-10-06 15:46 ` Mike Kowal
2025-09-25 17:30 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] ppc/pnv: Add PHB5 PCIe Host bridge " Aditya Gupta
2025-10-06 15:47 ` Mike Kowal
2025-09-25 17:30 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] ppc/pnv: Add ChipTOD model for Power11 Aditya Gupta
2025-10-06 15:47 ` Mike Kowal
2025-09-25 17:30 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] tests/powernv: Switch to buildroot images instead of op-build Aditya Gupta
2025-09-25 17:30 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] tests/powernv: Add PowerNV test for Power11 Aditya Gupta
2025-09-25 21:12 ` [PATCH v10 0/8] Power11 support for QEMU [PowerNV] Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-27 13:28 ` Aditya Gupta
2025-09-28 16:34 ` Amit Machhiwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250925173049.891406-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com \
--to=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kowal@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=milesg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).