From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] system/ramblock: Remove obsolete comment
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:45:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250929154529.72504-2-philmd@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250929154529.72504-1-philmd@linaro.org>
This comment was added almost 5 years ago in commit 41aa4e9fd84
("ram_addr: Split RAMBlock definition"). Clearly it got ignored:
$ git grep -l system/ramblock.h
hw/display/virtio-gpu-udmabuf.c
hw/hyperv/hv-balloon.c
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
migration/dirtyrate.c
migration/file.c
migration/multifd-nocomp.c
migration/multifd-qatzip.c
migration/multifd-qpl.c
migration/multifd-uadk.c
migration/multifd-zero-page.c
migration/multifd-zlib.c
migration/multifd-zstd.c
migration/multifd.c
migration/postcopy-ram.c
system/ram-block-attributes.c
target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
tests/qtest/fuzz/generic_fuzz.c
At this point it seems saner to just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
include/system/ramblock.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/system/ramblock.h b/include/system/ramblock.h
index 87e847e184a..8999206592d 100644
--- a/include/system/ramblock.h
+++ b/include/system/ramblock.h
@@ -11,11 +11,6 @@
*
*/
-/*
- * This header is for use by exec.c and memory.c ONLY. Do not include it.
- * The functions declared here will be removed soon.
- */
-
#ifndef SYSTEM_RAMBLOCK_H
#define SYSTEM_RAMBLOCK_H
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-29 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-29 15:45 [PATCH 0/6] system/ramblock: Sanitize header Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-09-29 15:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2025-09-29 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] system/ramblock: Remove obsolete comment David Hildenbrand
2025-09-29 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] system/ramblock: Move ram_block_is_pmem() declaration Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-09-29 16:58 ` Alex Bennée
2025-09-29 15:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] system/ramblock: Move ram_block_discard_*_range() declarations Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-09-29 15:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] system/ramblock: Use ram_addr_t in ram_block_discard_guest_memfd_range Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-01 15:59 ` Richard Henderson
2025-09-29 15:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] system/ramblock: Use ram_addr_t in ram_block_discard_range() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-09-29 15:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] system/ramblock: Move RAMBlock helpers out of "system/ram_addr.h" Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-01 16:03 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250929154529.72504-2-philmd@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).