From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8052ECAC5B0 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 19:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v4P7r-0007KI-Ub; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 15:38:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v4P7f-0007HJ-S6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 15:37:52 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v4P7W-0000VS-4A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 15:37:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1759433852; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fwA6DUIpDuQdN2DKjqQ6RYybUyt5n+aG35dPOMYS/kM=; b=XpcmAyEhD+c5qnWgPhQRuhvMddRqnXxtRM+RPDg+krUbUnQUwFY3pFPXbUyBfpK2tyMerY yaFeP8j0izn+owRkScRvVzXuwgF3tpQ3J0zI7bv00B5Z8vl0WVPOtIW9CNFG9LeHAOnMIG hprKeNwqtT/hnVilGN3OHtt/3A60oWo= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-608-2tU7LgS6MJiFhx2lFTZMtQ-1; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 15:37:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 2tU7LgS6MJiFhx2lFTZMtQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 2tU7LgS6MJiFhx2lFTZMtQ_1759433849 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 197CC18004D4; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 19:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.2.16.139]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA2D1800452; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 19:37:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Jean-Louis Dupond , Hanna Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi Subject: [PATCH 1/3] file-posix: populate pwrite_zeroes_alignment Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 14:39:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20251002184000.410486-2-stefanha@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20251002184000.410486-1-stefanha@redhat.com> References: <20251002184000.410486-1-stefanha@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=stefanha@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.451, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Linux block devices require write zeroes alignment whereas files do not. It may come as a surprise that block devices opened in buffered I/O mode require the alignment although regular read/write requests do not. Therefore it is necessary to populate the pwrite_zeroes_alignment field. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- block/file-posix.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c index 8c738674ce..05c92c824d 100644 --- a/block/file-posix.c +++ b/block/file-posix.c @@ -1602,6 +1602,23 @@ static void raw_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp) bs->bl.pdiscard_alignment = dalign; } + +#ifdef __linux__ + /* + * When request_alignment > 1, pwrite_zeroes_alignment does not need to + * be set explicitly. When request_alignment == 1, it must be set + * explicitly because Linux requires logical block size alignment. + */ + if (bs->bl.request_alignment == 1) { + ret = probe_logical_blocksize(s->fd, + &bs->bl.pwrite_zeroes_alignment); + if (ret < 0) { + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, + "Failed to probe logical block size"); + return; + } + } +#endif /* __linux__ */ } raw_refresh_zoned_limits(bs, &st, errp); -- 2.51.0