From: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
To: thuth@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, jrossi@linux.ibm.com,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: richard.henderson@linaro.org, pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org,
david@kernel.org, walling@linux.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
farman@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, iii@linux.ibm.com,
eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, zycai@linux.ibm.com,
alifm@linux.ibm.com, brueckner@linux.ibm.com,
jdaley@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 16/30] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Facility
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 17:41:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260305224146.664053-17-zycai@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260305224146.664053-1-zycai@linux.ibm.com>
Introduce Secure-IPL (SIPL) facility.
Use fac_ipl to represent bytes 136 and 137 for IPL device facilities
of the SCLP Read Info block.
Availability of SIPL facility is determined by byte 136 bit 1 of the
SCLP Read Info block. Byte 136's facilities cannot be represented
without the availability of the extended-length-SCCB, so add it as a
check for consistency.
Secure IPL is not available for guests under protected virtualization.
This feature is available starting with the gen16 CPU model.
Signed-off-by: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
hw/s390x/sclp.c | 2 ++
include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 4 +++-
target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 4 ++++
target/s390x/cpu_features.h | 1 +
target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc | 3 +++
target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 2 ++
target/s390x/gen-features.c | 2 ++
target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 3 +++
8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
index b9c3983df1..666bae33f0 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ static void read_SCP_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB)) {
s390_get_feat_block(S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC134,
&read_info->fac134);
+ s390_get_feat_block(S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC_IPL,
+ read_info->fac_ipl);
}
read_info->facilities = cpu_to_be64(SCLP_HAS_CPU_INFO |
diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
index ddc61f1c21..a9595d8007 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -136,7 +136,9 @@ typedef struct ReadInfo {
uint32_t hmfai;
uint8_t _reserved7[134 - 128]; /* 128-133 */
uint8_t fac134;
- uint8_t _reserved8[144 - 135]; /* 135-143 */
+ uint8_t _reserved8;
+ uint8_t fac_ipl[2]; /* 136-137 */
+ uint8_t _reserved9[144 - 138]; /* 138-143 */
struct CPUEntry entries[];
/*
* When the Extended-Length SCCB (ELS) feature is enabled the
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
index 436471f4b4..200bd8c15b 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ void s390_fill_feat_block(const S390FeatBitmap features, S390FeatType type,
* Some facilities are not available for CPUs in protected mode:
* - All SIE facilities because SIE is not available
* - DIAG318
+ * - Secure IPL Facility
*
* As VMs can move in and out of protected mode the CPU model
* doesn't protect us from that problem because it is only
@@ -149,6 +150,9 @@ void s390_fill_feat_block(const S390FeatBitmap features, S390FeatType type,
clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_DIAG_318)->bit, data);
clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_CERT_STORE)->bit, data);
break;
+ case S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC_IPL:
+ clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_SIPL)->bit, data);
+ break;
default:
return;
}
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.h b/target/s390x/cpu_features.h
index 5635839d03..b038198555 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ typedef enum {
S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CONF_CHAR,
S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CONF_CHAR_EXT,
S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC134,
+ S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC_IPL,
S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_CPU,
S390_FEAT_TYPE_MISC,
S390_FEAT_TYPE_PLO,
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc
index 2976ecd0ee..bcf8a666e4 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc
@@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ DEF_FEAT(SIE_IBS, "ibs", SCLP_CONF_CHAR_EXT, 10, "SIE: Interlock-and-broadcast-s
DEF_FEAT(DIAG_318, "diag318", SCLP_FAC134, 0, "Control program name and version codes")
DEF_FEAT(CERT_STORE, "cstore", SCLP_FAC134, 5, "Certificate Store functions")
+/* Features exposed via SCLP SCCB Facilities byte 136 - 137 (bit numbers relative to byte-136) */
+DEF_FEAT(SIPL, "sipl", SCLP_FAC_IPL, 1, "Secure-IPL facility")
+
/* Features exposed via SCLP CPU info. */
DEF_FEAT(SIE_F2, "sief2", SCLP_CPU, 4, "SIE: interception format 2 (Virtual SIE)")
DEF_FEAT(SIE_SKEY, "skey", SCLP_CPU, 5, "SIE: Storage-key facility")
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
index 6b8471700e..f99536ef9a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
@@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ bool s390_has_feat(S390Feat feat)
case S390_FEAT_SIE_CMMA:
case S390_FEAT_SIE_PFMFI:
case S390_FEAT_SIE_IBS:
+ case S390_FEAT_SIPL:
case S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY:
return false;
break;
@@ -507,6 +508,7 @@ static void check_consistency(const S390CPUModel *model)
{ S390_FEAT_AP_QUEUE_INTERRUPT_CONTROL, S390_FEAT_AP },
{ S390_FEAT_DIAG_318, S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB },
{ S390_FEAT_CERT_STORE, S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB },
+ { S390_FEAT_SIPL, S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB },
{ S390_FEAT_NNPA, S390_FEAT_VECTOR },
{ S390_FEAT_RDP, S390_FEAT_LOCAL_TLB_CLEARING },
{ S390_FEAT_UV_FEAT_AP, S390_FEAT_AP },
diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
index 6c20c3a862..bd2060ab93 100644
--- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
+++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
@@ -721,6 +721,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN16_GA1[] = {
S390_FEAT_UV_FEAT_AP,
S390_FEAT_UV_FEAT_AP_INTR,
S390_FEAT_CERT_STORE,
+ S390_FEAT_SIPL,
};
static uint16_t full_GEN17_GA1[] = {
@@ -922,6 +923,7 @@ static uint16_t qemu_MAX[] = {
S390_FEAT_PRNO_TRNG,
S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB,
S390_FEAT_CERT_STORE,
+ S390_FEAT_SIPL,
};
/****** END FEATURE DEFS ******/
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
index cba431688b..40197cca7a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -2518,6 +2518,9 @@ bool kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, Error **errp)
set_bit(S390_FEAT_CERT_STORE, model->features);
+ /* Some Secure IPL facilities are emulated by QEMU */
+ set_bit(S390_FEAT_SIPL, model->features);
+
/* Test for Ultravisor features that influence secure guest behavior */
query_uv_feat_guest(model->features);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 22:41 [PATCH v9 00/30] Secure IPL Support for SCSI Scheme of virtio-blk/virtio-scsi Devices Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 01/30] Add boot-certs to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 02/30] crypto/x509-utils: Refactor with GNUTLS fallback Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 03/30] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for certificate store Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 04/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Create " Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 05/30] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 320 for Certificate Store Facility Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 06/30] s390x/diag: Refactor address validation check from diag308_parm_check Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 07/30] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 08/30] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 320 subcode 2 Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 09/30] s390x/diag: Implement " Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-13 19:58 ` Collin Walling
2026-03-16 18:04 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 10/30] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 508 for secure IPL operations Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 11/30] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 508 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 12/30] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 13/30] s390x/ipl: Introduce IPL Information Report Block (IIRB) Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-13 20:00 ` Collin Walling
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 14/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Define memory for IPLB and convert IPLB to pointers Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 15/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Add IPIB flags to IPL Parameter Block Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` Zhuoying Cai [this message]
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 17/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_run() Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 18/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Rework zipl_load_segment function Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 19/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signature verification for secure IPL in audit mode Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-17 3:41 ` Collin Walling
2026-03-25 19:11 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 20/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signed component address overlap checks Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-17 4:25 ` Collin Walling
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 21/30] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Code Loading Attributes Facility (SCLAF) Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 22/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add additional security checks for secure boot Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-17 6:54 ` Collin Walling
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 23/30] Add secure-boot to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 24/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Set IPIB flags for secure IPL Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 25/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle true secure IPL mode Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-17 7:02 ` Collin Walling
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 26/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot with multiple boot devices Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 27/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot without specifying a boot device Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 28/30] tests/functional/s390x: Add secure IPL functional test Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 29/30] docs/specs: Add secure IPL documentation Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 22:41 ` [PATCH v9 30/30] docs/system/s390x: " Zhuoying Cai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260305224146.664053-17-zycai@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zycai@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jdaley@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox