On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 08:54:50AM -0500, Jaehoon Kim wrote: > Refine adaptive polling in aio_poll by updating iothread polling > duration based on weighted AioHandler event intervals. > > Each AioHandler's poll.ns is updated using a weighted factor when an > event occurs. Idle handlers accumulate block_ns until poll_max_ns and > then reset to 0, preventing sporadically active handlers from > unnecessarily prolonging iothread polling. > > The iothread polling duration is set based on the largest poll.ns among > active handlers. The shrink divider defaults to 2, matching the grow > rate, to reduce frequent poll_ns resets for slow devices. > > The default weight factor (POLL_WEIGHT_SHIFT=3, meaning the current > interval contributes 12.5% to the weighted average) was selected based > on extensive testing comparing QEMU 10.0.0 baseline vs poll-weight=2 > and poll-weight=3 across various workloads. > > The table below shows a comparison between: > -Host: RHEL 10.1 GA + qemu-10.0.0-14.el10_1, Guest: RHEL 9.6GA vs. > -Host: RHEL 10.1 GA + qemu-10.0.0-14.el10_1 (w=2/w=3), Guest: RHEL 9.6GA > for FIO FCP and FICON with 1 iothread and 8 iothreads. > The values shown are the averages for numjobs 1, 4, and 8. > > Summary of results (% change vs baseline): > > | poll-weight=2 | poll-weight=3 > --------------------|--------------------|----------------- > Throughput avg | -2.4% (all tests) | -2.2% (all tests) > CPU consumption avg | -10.9% (all tests) | -9.4% (all tests) > > Both weight=2 and weight=3 show significant CPU consumption reduction > (~10%) compared to baseline, which addresses the CPU utilization > regression observed in QEMU 10.0.0. The throughput impact is minimal > for both (~2%). > > Weight=3 is selected as the default because it provides slightly better > throughput (-2.2% vs -2.4%) while still achieving substantial CPU > savings (-9.4%). The difference between weight=2 and weight=3 is small, > but weight=3 offers a better balance for general-purpose workloads. > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Kim > --- > include/qemu/aio.h | 4 +- > util/aio-posix.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > util/async.c | 1 + > 3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/qemu/aio.h b/include/qemu/aio.h > index 8cca2360d1..6c77a190e9 100644 > --- a/include/qemu/aio.h > +++ b/include/qemu/aio.h > @@ -195,7 +195,8 @@ struct BHListSlice { > typedef QSLIST_HEAD(, AioHandler) AioHandlerSList; > > typedef struct AioPolledEvent { > - int64_t ns; /* current polling time in nanoseconds */ > + bool has_event; /* Flag to indicate if an event has occurred */ > + int64_t ns; /* estimated block time in nanoseconds */ > } AioPolledEvent; > > struct AioContext { > @@ -306,6 +307,7 @@ struct AioContext { > int poll_disable_cnt; > > /* Polling mode parameters */ > + int64_t poll_ns; /* current polling time in nanoseconds */ > int64_t poll_max_ns; /* maximum polling time in nanoseconds */ > int64_t poll_grow; /* polling time growth factor */ > int64_t poll_shrink; /* polling time shrink factor */ > diff --git a/util/aio-posix.c b/util/aio-posix.c > index b02beb0505..2b3522f2f9 100644 > --- a/util/aio-posix.c > +++ b/util/aio-posix.c > @@ -29,9 +29,11 @@ > > /* Stop userspace polling on a handler if it isn't active for some time */ > #define POLL_IDLE_INTERVAL_NS (7 * NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND) > +#define POLL_WEIGHT_SHIFT (3) > > -static void adjust_polling_time(AioContext *ctx, AioPolledEvent *poll, > - int64_t block_ns); > +static void adjust_block_ns(AioContext *ctx, int64_t block_ns); > +static void grow_polling_time(AioContext *ctx, int64_t block_ns); > +static void shrink_polling_time(AioContext *ctx, int64_t block_ns); > > bool aio_poll_disabled(AioContext *ctx) > { > @@ -373,7 +375,7 @@ static bool aio_dispatch_ready_handlers(AioContext *ctx, > * add the handler to ctx->poll_aio_handlers. This comment refers to adjusting the polling time. The code no longer does this and the comment should be updated. > */ > if (ctx->poll_max_ns && QLIST_IS_INSERTED(node, node_poll)) { > - adjust_polling_time(ctx, &node->poll, block_ns); aio_dispatch_ready_handlers() no longer uses the block_ns argument. It can be removed. > + node->poll.has_event = true; > } > } > > @@ -560,18 +562,13 @@ static bool run_poll_handlers(AioContext *ctx, AioHandlerList *ready_list, > static bool try_poll_mode(AioContext *ctx, AioHandlerList *ready_list, > int64_t *timeout) > { > - AioHandler *node; > int64_t max_ns; > > if (QLIST_EMPTY_RCU(&ctx->poll_aio_handlers)) { > return false; > } > > - max_ns = 0; > - QLIST_FOREACH(node, &ctx->poll_aio_handlers, node_poll) { > - max_ns = MAX(max_ns, node->poll.ns); > - } > - max_ns = qemu_soonest_timeout(*timeout, max_ns); > + max_ns = qemu_soonest_timeout(*timeout, ctx->poll_ns); > > if (max_ns && !ctx->fdmon_ops->need_wait(ctx)) { > /* > @@ -587,46 +584,98 @@ static bool try_poll_mode(AioContext *ctx, AioHandlerList *ready_list, > return false; > } > > -static void adjust_polling_time(AioContext *ctx, AioPolledEvent *poll, > - int64_t block_ns) > +static void shrink_polling_time(AioContext *ctx, int64_t block_ns) > { > - if (block_ns <= poll->ns) { > - /* This is the sweet spot, no adjustment needed */ > - } else if (block_ns > ctx->poll_max_ns) { > - /* We'd have to poll for too long, poll less */ > - int64_t old = poll->ns; > - > - if (ctx->poll_shrink) { > - poll->ns /= ctx->poll_shrink; > - } else { > - poll->ns = 0; > - } > + /* > + * Reduce polling time if the block_ns is zero or > + * less than the current poll_ns. > + */ > + int64_t old = ctx->poll_ns; > + int64_t shrink = ctx->poll_shrink; > > - trace_poll_shrink(ctx, old, poll->ns); > - } else if (poll->ns < ctx->poll_max_ns && > - block_ns < ctx->poll_max_ns) { > - /* There is room to grow, poll longer */ > - int64_t old = poll->ns; > - int64_t grow = ctx->poll_grow; > + if (shrink == 0) { > + shrink = 2; > + } > > - if (grow == 0) { > - grow = 2; > - } > + if (block_ns < (ctx->poll_ns / shrink)) { > + ctx->poll_ns /= shrink; > + } > > - if (poll->ns) { > - poll->ns *= grow; > - } else { > - poll->ns = 4000; /* start polling at 4 microseconds */ > - } > + trace_poll_shrink(ctx, old, ctx->poll_ns); This trace event should be inside if (block_ns < (ctx->poll_ns / shrink)) like it was before this patch. > +} > > - if (poll->ns > ctx->poll_max_ns) { > - poll->ns = ctx->poll_max_ns; > - } > +static void grow_polling_time(AioContext *ctx, int64_t block_ns) > +{ > + /* There is room to grow, poll longer */ > + int64_t old = ctx->poll_ns; > + int64_t grow = ctx->poll_grow; > > - trace_poll_grow(ctx, old, poll->ns); > + if (grow == 0) { > + grow = 2; > } > + > + if (block_ns > ctx->poll_ns * grow) { > + ctx->poll_ns = block_ns; > + } else { > + ctx->poll_ns *= grow; > + } > + > + if (ctx->poll_ns > ctx->poll_max_ns) { > + ctx->poll_ns = ctx->poll_max_ns; > + } > + > + trace_poll_grow(ctx, old, ctx->poll_ns); Same here. > } > > +static void adjust_block_ns(AioContext *ctx, int64_t block_ns) > +{ > + AioHandler *node; > + int64_t adj_block_ns = -1; > + > + QLIST_FOREACH(node, &ctx->poll_aio_handlers, node_poll) { > + if (node->poll.has_event) { Did you consider unifying node->poll.has_event with node->poll_idle_timeout, which is assigned now + POLL_IDLE_INTERVAL_NS every time ->io_poll() detects an event? For instance, rename node->poll_idle_timeout to node->last_event_timestamp and assign now without adding POLL_IDLE_INTERVAL_NS. Then use the field for both idle node removal and adjust_block_ns() (pass in now). > + /* > + * Update poll.ns for the node with an event. > + * Uses a weighted average of the current block_ns and the previous > + * poll.ns to smooth out polling time adjustments. > + */ > + node->poll.ns = node->poll.ns > + ? (node->poll.ns - (node->poll.ns >> POLL_WEIGHT_SHIFT)) > + + (block_ns >> POLL_WEIGHT_SHIFT) : block_ns; > + > + if (node->poll.ns > ctx->poll_max_ns) { > + node->poll.ns = 0; > + } Previously: - if (poll->ns > ctx->poll_max_ns) { - poll->ns = ctx->poll_max_ns; - } Was this causing excessive CPU consumption in your benchmarks? Can you explain the rationale for zeroing the poll time? Aside from reducing CPU consumption, it also reduces the chance that polling will succeed and could therefore impact performance. I'm asking about this because this patch makes several changes at once and I'm not sure how the CPU usage and performance changes are attributed to these multiple changes. I want to make sure the changes merged are minimal and the best set - sometimes when multiple things are changes at the same time, not all of them are beneficial. > + /* > + * To avoid excessive polling time increase, update adj_block_ns > + * for nodes with the event flag set to true > + */ > + adj_block_ns = MAX(adj_block_ns, node->poll.ns); adj_block_ns is not the blocking time, it's the maximum current poll time across all nodes. It would be clearer to change the variable name. > + node->poll.has_event = false; > + } else { 4-space indentation should be used. > + /* > + * No event now, but was active before. > + * If it waits longer than poll_max_ns, poll.ns will stay 0 > + * until the next event arrives. > + */ > + if (node->poll.ns != 0) { > + node->poll.ns += block_ns; Why is block_ns being added to an recently inactive node's polling time? Here node->poll.ns no longer measures the weighted time until the handler had an event. If the goal is to get rid of inactive nodes, then maybe the idle handler removal mechanism should be made more aggresive instead? > + if (node->poll.ns > ctx->poll_max_ns) { > + node->poll.ns = 0; > + } > + } > + } > + } > + > + if (adj_block_ns >= 0) { > + if (adj_block_ns > ctx->poll_ns) { > + grow_polling_time(ctx, adj_block_ns); > + } else { > + shrink_polling_time(ctx, adj_block_ns); > + } > + } > + } > + > bool aio_poll(AioContext *ctx, bool blocking) > { > AioHandlerList ready_list = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(ready_list); > @@ -723,6 +772,10 @@ bool aio_poll(AioContext *ctx, bool blocking) > > aio_free_deleted_handlers(ctx); > > + if (ctx->poll_max_ns) { > + adjust_block_ns(ctx, block_ns); > + } > + > qemu_lockcnt_dec(&ctx->list_lock); > > progress |= timerlistgroup_run_timers(&ctx->tlg); > @@ -784,6 +837,7 @@ void aio_context_set_poll_params(AioContext *ctx, int64_t max_ns, > > qemu_lockcnt_inc(&ctx->list_lock); > QLIST_FOREACH(node, &ctx->aio_handlers, node) { > + node->poll.has_event = false; > node->poll.ns = 0; > } > qemu_lockcnt_dec(&ctx->list_lock); > @@ -794,6 +848,7 @@ void aio_context_set_poll_params(AioContext *ctx, int64_t max_ns, > ctx->poll_max_ns = max_ns; > ctx->poll_grow = grow; > ctx->poll_shrink = shrink; > + ctx->poll_ns = 0; > > aio_notify(ctx); > } > diff --git a/util/async.c b/util/async.c > index 80d6b01a8a..9d3627566f 100644 > --- a/util/async.c > +++ b/util/async.c > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ AioContext *aio_context_new(Error **errp) > timerlistgroup_init(&ctx->tlg, aio_timerlist_notify, ctx); > > ctx->poll_max_ns = 0; > + ctx->poll_ns = 0; > ctx->poll_grow = 0; > ctx->poll_shrink = 0; > > -- > 2.50.1 >