Re: [PATCH 0/5] amd_iommu fixes staged for 11.1

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 10:08:01PM +0000, Alejandro Jimenez wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I have staged these recently reviewed AMD vIOMMU fixes for 11.1:
> 
> https://github.com/aljimenezb/qemu/commits/amdvi-next
> Base: 30e8a06b64aa ("Merge tag 'net-pull-request' of https://github.com/jasowang/qemu into staging")
> Tip:  018c1dfb3e8c ("amd_iommu: Fix endianness handling for command buffer entries")
> 
> Patch 1 is an independent fix previously posted at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260616174620.438468-1-alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com/
> 
> Patches 2-5 address a Coverity finding and big-endian portability
> issues. They were reviewed in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260624195925.1254462-1-alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com/

Great, I'm applying these. Thanks!


> 
> I did basic smoke testing on an AMD Zen4 host using the AMD vIOMMU device.
> Completed several guest boot and reboot cycles with xtsup both enabled and
> disabled. No regressions were observed in guest startup or reboot behavior.
> 
> There are two other outstanding series pending review, but I am unlikely to
> complete review/testing by myself for those before the upcoming soft-freeze
> deadline.
> 
> Thank you,
> Alejandro


To be frank, these are bugfixes and such changes are okay after soft freeze. Thanks!

> Alejandro Jimenez (4):
>   amd_iommu: Return int from page walk status helpers
>   amd_iommu: Decode XT interrupt control register without bitfields
>   amd_iommu: Decode IRTEs without bitfields
>   amd_iommu: Fix endianness handling for command buffer entries
> 
> David Hoppenbrouwers (1):
>   amd_iommu: Fix opcode reported in invalid command handling
> 
>  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  hw/i386/amd_iommu.h |  63 -----------------
>  2 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 30e8a06b64aa58a3990ba39cb5d09531e7d265e0
> -- 
> 2.47.3