Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/41] QAPI patches for 2017-06-09

["Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>]

Hi

----- Original Message -----
> On 9 June 2017 at 14:46, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> > The following changes since commit
> > 64175afc695c0672876fbbfc31b299c86d562cb4:
> >
> >   arm_gicv3: Fix ICC_BPR1 reset value when EL3 not implemented (2017-06-07
> >   17:21:44 +0100)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> >   git://repo.or.cz/qemu/armbru.git tags/pull-qapi-2017-06-09
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 9f70c3652654d59a1cc0e2ef4cc5b0e541d93579:
> >
> >   tests/qdict: check more get_try_int() cases (2017-06-09 13:48:45 +0200)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > QAPI patches for 2017-06-09
> >
> 
> Some compilers don't like the assert(0) idiom used in qnum.c to
> say "code flow doesn't reach end of function":
> 
> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/qobject/qnum.c: In function
> ‘qnum_get_double’:
> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/qobject/qnum.c:162:1: error:
> control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
>  }
>  ^
> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/qobject/qnum.c: In function
> ‘qnum_to_string’:
> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/qobject/qnum.c:200:1: error:
> control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
>  }
>  ^
> 
> (probably older gcc; that was the w32 gcc compiler; one of
> patchew's build environments fails the same way).
> 
> I think one common working idiom for this is:
> int foo(void) {
>    switch (whatever) {
>        case X:
>           return 0;
>        case Y:
>           return 1;
>        default:
>           g_assert_not_reached();
>    }
> }
> 
> Can you fix and resend the pullreq, please?

Markus made me switch from g_assert_not_reached() to assert(0) in v3.

He is on PTO this week, if you don't mind (as you wanted this series applied quickly), you could fix it by adding dummy return?