From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: arei gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] memory: hide mr->ram_addr from qemu_get_ram_ptr users
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:19:13 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2064029908.40944831.1458908353337.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160325121304.GA21300@ad.usersys.redhat.com>
> > > If called by address_space_unmap, is this addition still correct?
> >
> > No, thanks for the careful review! That's another opportunity
> > for cleanup actually, splitting the (few) users of qemu_ram_addr_from_host
> > that really need a ram_addr_t and those (the majority) that need a
> > MemoryRegion and offset. They can use two different functions. I'll
> > defer this to 2.7 and post the patches to do so later.
>
> Good idea. The above "block == NULL" qemu_get_ram_ptr callers could use a
> separate function, too - frankly I don't like that function interface too
> much.
> What do you think?
I don't know, at least block == NULL has a clear meaning. It's not entirely
satisfying, but the users are readable and the ones that pass NULL stand out.
In the case of qemu_ram_addr_from_host, on the other hand, there's a clear
opportunity to avoid bugs.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-25 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-24 11:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] memory: cleanup users of memory_region_get_ram_addr Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-24 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] memory: remove unnecessary masking of MemoryRegion ram_addr Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-25 6:20 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-03 13:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-24 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] memory: hide mr->ram_addr from qemu_get_ram_ptr users Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-25 6:20 ` Fam Zheng
2016-03-25 11:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-25 12:13 ` Fam Zheng
2016-03-25 12:19 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-04-03 13:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-03 17:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-04 8:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-04 8:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-04 9:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2064029908.40944831.1458908353337.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).