From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LA2iB-0006LX-05
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:33:15 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LA2iA-0006LE-GZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:33:14 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35630 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LA2iA-0006L8-BM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:33:14 -0500
Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:59045)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <bounces@nabble.com>) id 1LA2iA-0000Kx-Bj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:33:14 -0500
Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156])
	by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <bounces@nabble.com>) id 1LA2i6-0005D9-5u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:33:10 -0800
Message-ID: <20914766.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 05:33:10 -0800 (PST)
From: baibai_tao <baibai_tao@163.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Isochronous problem with usb OHCI
In-Reply-To: <84501dc10811170820q5003cb44j91df9026fb419c9b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <84501dc10811170820q5003cb44j91df9026fb419c9b@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


I met the same problem when using usb-ohci.c with usb-linux.c and usb.c in
head version.
Comparing usb-ohci.c on head and in 0.9.1, there is little difference but
the other 2 files are totally different. 
It could work if I pickup  usb-linux.c and usb.c from 0.9.1.


Pierre Le Magourou wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In fact, I wonder what is the normal behavior for an isochronous packet
> completion. Does someone have had a similar problem with isochronous
> frames
> when using usb ohci ?
> 
> --
> Pierre
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Isochronous-problem-with-usb-OHCI-tp20542659p20914766.html
Sent from the QEMU - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.