qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com,
	mtosatti@redhat.com,
	"qemu-devel developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: warn if num cpus is greater than num recommended
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 04:00:07 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2119643893.455450.1377504007366.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521B0727.30602@redhat.com>



----- Original Message -----
> Il 23/08/2013 13:33, Andrew Jones ha scritto:
> > Does smp_cpus map to the current
> > number of cpus, or to the number of possible cpus? If it maps to the number
> > of possible cpus, then this is the right place. If the former, then I guess
> > it'll take more thought. I'ved added Igor (still on vacation) to this
> > reply,
> > but regardless I vote we worry about hot-plug limit checking in different
> > patch.
> 
> smp_cpus is the initial number, max_cpus is the number of possible cpus.
> 

Yeah, I noticed that this issue is at least partially addressed already with
my v2, which incorporates Marcelo's check against the number of hotpluggable
cpus (max_cpus).

drew

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-26  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-22 15:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: warn if num cpus is greater than num recommended Andrew Jones
2013-08-22 16:12 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-08-22 16:21   ` Andreas Färber
2013-08-23 11:33     ` Andrew Jones
2013-08-26  7:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-26  8:00         ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2013-08-22 16:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-23 11:35   ` Andrew Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2119643893.455450.1377504007366.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
    --to=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).