From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdO0t-0006mn-D9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:28:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdO0o-0006Vv-FR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:27:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdO0o-0006UH-7v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:27:54 -0500 From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:15:53 -0500 Message-ID: <2177432.M8aXCcjkoC@sifl> In-Reply-To: <50B4E634.1010902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1352749698-1219-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20834744.ZIVpS0hmCl@sifl> <50B4E634.1010902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 1/5] seccomp: adding new syscalls (bugzilla 855162) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Corey Bryant , Eduardo Otubo Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:11:32 AM Corey Bryant wrote: > Thanks for the additional details. They were very useful. I was able > to reproduce this when I manually built spice release 0.10.1, but not > with the Fedora 0.10.1 package. One difference I noticed is that the > Fedora version wasn't logging info messages. > > Nonetheless, we'll send new patches soon. It looks like the following > were missing: epoll_create, epoll_wait, and epoll_ctl Great, glad to hear my test system wasn't just being stubborn :) I'll re-test as soon as I see the patches. -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat