From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73ACC433E3 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA76208B3 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=crudebyte.com header.i=@crudebyte.com header.b="j9e5myq6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9CA76208B3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=crudebyte.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:60634 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlEAi-0005Jo-U2 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:10:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlE9K-0003m1-0A; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:09:22 -0400 Received: from lizzy.crudebyte.com ([91.194.90.13]:57855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlE9H-0004m4-KA; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:09:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crudebyte.com; s=lizzy; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=8Rk9Uo2xN9yWmXLDN78khPtPXmhGX2X1/96JRmm4vhg=; b=j9e5myq6WZJy38fA88ExitP2aV SOvi9SPab6W58quEfE0t9kFGWgQ/xw1lfAe8GQU/5REUaXY34hU7yGeqedEo+OG0LoQ53USs2peg+ P0R2RccMm8mFeAV9Ucw1s6WrHuKh2dMMG0L3dofOoA8tmWC6YhdD+xc5q2PyRxVQ5Ro92TOXwRmpn hKiiM+NNKCSrzzCOaHBZ/5/R11EQHasveSny6DYM5U1OHLj6Y2GfhZPtZmeXK9/77W295Vwta8Pv9 s1/zZrsQvE5qMEq4Zj8ELxqFdC/PBKNk6k5x2f5L1cea18PaQMHzDVFV2pqaqXn6p1T5Qia6wjEql W24oDb2g==; From: Christian Schoenebeck To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Greg Kurz , Michael Roth , qemu-stable@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 72/78] 9p: Lock directory streams with a CoMutex Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:09:04 +0200 Message-ID: <2182702.l5DGtSyN0k@silver> In-Reply-To: <20200616171440.172f1173@bahia.lan> References: <20200616141547.24664-1-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200616141547.24664-73-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200616171440.172f1173@bahia.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=91.194.90.13; envelope-from=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com; helo=lizzy.crudebyte.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/16 12:09:10 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Dienstag, 16. Juni 2020 17:14:40 CEST Greg Kurz wrote: > Cc'ing co-maintainer Christian Schoenebeck. > > Christian, > > If there are some more commits you think are worth being cherry picked > for QEMU 4.2.1, please inform Michael before freeze on 2020-06-22. Indeed, for that particular stable branch I would see the following 9p fixes as additional candidates (chronologically top down): 841b8d099c [trivial] 9pfs: local: Fix possible memory leak in local_link() 846cf408a4 [maybe] 9p: local: always return -1 on error in local_unlinkat_common 9580d60e66 [maybe] virtio-9p-device: fix memleak in virtio_9p_device_unrealize 659f195328 [trivial] 9p/proxy: Fix export_flags a5804fcf7b [maybe] 9pfs: local: ignore O_NOATIME if we don't have permissions 03556ea920 [trivial] 9pfs: include linux/limits.h for XATTR_SIZE_MAX a4c4d46272 [recommended] xen/9pfs: yield when there isn't enough room on the ring What do you think Greg? What's the recommended way for me to keep track of imminent stable picks/ freezes in future? Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck