From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fV1yR-0003Me-2z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:46:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fV1yO-0001LS-Q7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:46:07 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:55116 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fV1yO-0001LD-Lt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:46:04 -0400 References: <20180612065150.21110-1-ville.skytta@iki.fi> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <21aaf5e7-a25c-0d07-1638-2537cb5360ce@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:46:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docs: Grammar and spelling fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ville_Skytt=c3=a4?= Cc: QEMU Developers On 06/14/2018 11:49 AM, Ville Skytt=C3=A4 wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 06/12/2018 01:51 AM, Ville Skytt=C3=A4 wrote: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ville Skytt=C3=A4 >>> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell >>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake >>> --- >> >> >> It's helpful to use 'git send-email -v3' (or 'git format-patch -v3', >> depending on your workflow) so that the subject line tags this as a th= ird >> spin of the same patch previously posted, and to include, after the --= - >> separator, how it differs from v2 (in this case, incorporating my revi= ew >> comment to reflow a long line). Otherwise, automated tools might not = pick >> up on the fact that this email replaces your earlier submission as the= one >> to test. Other submission tips can be found at: >> >> https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch >=20 > Ok, will keep that in mind for the future. In the meantime, am I still > expected to do something to this latest patch, or just wait :)? At this point, waiting is probably fine. If no one else responds after a=20 week (such as a maintainer confirming they have queued it), then=20 replying with a ping would be reasonable. --=20 Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org