From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9178C4743D for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7217A61185 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:51:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7217A61185 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqigz-0008N2-Fj for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:51:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqigB-0007Rz-Uq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:50:31 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:27181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqigA-0004qN-9r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:50:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623185429; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=denD12Bwx9PQm5UBoKUv6B0bXmdWwpsuImR8ZzVSa34=; b=ajkwTsO7YuHV37/TxDnXkXkMLdipq8YfA9LsuTvHJdy7t1D/qXztmzu4tmmsk+aAceURnw ZlEynhWmVrVv5J4PC8Gl4izwUTaY4Im9d3eaCDjoN8M9Uere2kwl5psy+EWWu0lNO7Re3f iLwo0eyNdKRNyd+tDtdgQEY194pVkGo= Received: from mail-oo1-f69.google.com (mail-oo1-f69.google.com [209.85.161.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-43-ALvIGEXkMkWs4HO_uMQs1A-1; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:50:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ALvIGEXkMkWs4HO_uMQs1A-1 Received: by mail-oo1-f69.google.com with SMTP id x24-20020a4a9b980000b0290249d5c08dd6so4639046ooj.15 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:50:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=denD12Bwx9PQm5UBoKUv6B0bXmdWwpsuImR8ZzVSa34=; b=Ns9Ed4DWPZY89tjvRGN8ZbG/+MvVhw0heHi3e+mwbBow3vHsGcv7LNDnw/DL8dXWPx a+c8wALlxBRhpwGu28A2LVKaZV+xq6HFN9ngOtjzhCpqQfSK2MBX0n8wEbxEz8zHpiwp 44LEotn6pRYpWyOURlu+/x+N0B7IGKTF5djSKZS/xAg/Y8OZv58pA77hThl2PTEdVtxV n0jZ7DhhbXTs2rUe5PPo4MhOJOkNsGn3MQjwR8T1IUsp1x54WS+kwzi4KjQxq0Z9/vAJ cN8EAVkkhN/LQ1A536srDfsrZIjJfqujm3aQJr+EKv9BBR4CnurkGbfVAGm9L+Hw1VVh 7+oA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kGCdr7DvkxeQPH1OXbKcFP4tMPvv6Ukwyj0KImax6W/2altJt 5Bx9eGUhDJAc/q1M9lczvFKdZKp0nUEXmWd7aXFcepai2FPS5Hn7RKUcjJ72aPhLU5ngSaV6tc2 jmwo2u+mccxxF8/Y= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3dc:: with SMTP id o28mr4029442oie.64.1623185427472; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:50:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyIsLzGhbhQI/+s04m8kpS62LZgsVIyCv/BTrUtvLZpG3tbXB1nJLs5wI+LaVoDr5C1GFSeRA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3dc:: with SMTP id o28mr4029432oie.64.1623185427289; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.173] (ip68-102-25-99.ks.ok.cox.net. [68.102.25.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d1sm3379358otu.9.2021.06.08.13.50.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Connor Kuehl as reviewer for AMD SEV To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= References: <20210608192537.103584-1-ckuehl@redhat.com> From: Connor Kuehl Message-ID: <220f3a15-a25d-7c89-d9de-a8c1cf0cd708@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:50:25 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=ckuehl@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=ckuehl@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.197, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tom Lendacky , Brijesh Singh , Eduardo Habkost , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 6/8/21 3:45 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> Right, I am just worried that if I am the only person that shows up in >> the get_maintainer.pl output, the submitter will have to know some other >> way who a relevant maintainer is that can take the patches otherwise >> they won't be CC'd. Or we'll have to hope a relevant maintainer sees >> them on the list. Or I'll have to chase down a maintainer myself >> assuming the reviews all check out. :-) > > Well there's no real guarantee that any of the previous committers will > take the patch even if they are listed by get_maintainer. This is typical > with anything lacking a maintainer assigned. We typically hope that > whoever runs the "misc" queue sees the patch and picks it up, but often > it requires pings to remind someone to pick it up. > > The only real right answer here is to actually get someone as the > nominated maintainer. Every other scenario is a just a band aid and > is not a good experiance for contributors. A nominated reviewer is > usually hoped to be a stepping stone to someone becoming maintainer > in future, so in that sense the fact that only you will be cc'd is > sort of intentional :-) That makes perfect sense. I'll forge on ahead, then :-) Thanks! Connor