From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:01:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2228436c-2271-ec27-96ee-67825ac1b13f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220712110615.09c3e303@redhat.com>
On 7/12/22 10:06, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:03:28 +0100
> Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/11/22 16:31, Joao Martins wrote:
>>> On 7/11/22 15:52, Joao Martins wrote:
>>>> On 7/11/22 13:56, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:10:13 +0100
>>>>> Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
>>>>>> index a79fa1b6beeb..07025b510540 100644
>>>>>> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
>>>>>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
>>>>>> @@ -907,6 +907,87 @@ static uint64_t pc_get_cxl_range_end(PCMachineState *pcms)
>>>>>> return start;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static hwaddr pc_max_used_gpa(PCMachineState *pcms,
>>>>>> + hwaddr above_4g_mem_start,
>>>>>> + uint64_t pci_hole64_size)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>>> + if (!x86ms->above_4g_mem_size) {
>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>> + * 32-bit pci hole goes from
>>>>>> + * end-of-low-ram (@below_4g_mem_size) to IOAPIC.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> + return IO_APIC_DEFAULT_ADDRESS - 1;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>> this hunk still bothers me (nothing changed wrt v5 issues around it)
>>>>> issues recap: (
>>>>> 1. correctness of it
>>>>> 2. being limited to AMD only, while it seems pretty generic to me
>>>>> 3. should be a separate patch
>>>>> )
>>>>>
>>>> How about I instead delete this hunk, and only call pc_set_amd_above_4g_mem_start()
>>>> when there's @above_4g_mem_size ? Like in pc_memory_init() I would instead:
>>>>
>>>> if (IS_AMD_CPU(&cpu->env) && x86ms->above_4g_mem_size) {
>>>> hwaddr start = x86ms->above_4g_mem_start;
>>>>
>>>> if (pc_max_used_gpa(pcms, start, pci_hole64_size) >= AMD_HT_START) {
>>>> pc_set_amd_above_4g_mem_start(pcms, pci_hole64_size);
>>>> }
>>>> ...
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Given that otherwise it is impossible to ever encounter the 1T boundary.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And while at it I would also remove any unneeded arguments from pc_max_used_gpa(),
>>> which would turn the function into this:
>>>
>>> +static hwaddr pc_max_used_gpa(uint64_t pci_hole64_size)
>>> +{
>>> + return pc_pci_hole64_start() + pci_hole64_size;
>>> +}
>>>
>>> I would nuke the added helper if it wasn't for having 2 call sites in this patch.
>>>
>>
>> Full patch diff further below -- after removing pc_max_used_gpa() and made further
>> cleanups given this code can be much simpler after using this approach.
>>
>>>> If not ... what other alternative would address your concern?
>>>>
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
>> index e178bbc4129c..1ded3faeffe0 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
>> @@ -882,6 +882,62 @@ static uint64_t pc_get_cxl_range_end(PCMachineState *pcms)
>> return start;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * AMD systems with an IOMMU have an additional hole close to the
>> + * 1Tb, which are special GPAs that cannot be DMA mapped. Depending
>> + * on kernel version, VFIO may or may not let you DMA map those ranges.
>> + * Starting Linux v5.4 we validate it, and can't create guests on AMD machines
>> + * with certain memory sizes. It's also wrong to use those IOVA ranges
>> + * in detriment of leading to IOMMU INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST or worse.
>> + * The ranges reserved for Hyper-Transport are:
>> + *
>> + * FD_0000_0000h - FF_FFFF_FFFFh
>> + *
>> + * The ranges represent the following:
>> + *
>> + * Base Address Top Address Use
>> + *
>> + * FD_0000_0000h FD_F7FF_FFFFh Reserved interrupt address space
>> + * FD_F800_0000h FD_F8FF_FFFFh Interrupt/EOI IntCtl
>> + * FD_F900_0000h FD_F90F_FFFFh Legacy PIC IACK
>> + * FD_F910_0000h FD_F91F_FFFFh System Management
>> + * FD_F920_0000h FD_FAFF_FFFFh Reserved Page Tables
>> + * FD_FB00_0000h FD_FBFF_FFFFh Address Translation
>> + * FD_FC00_0000h FD_FDFF_FFFFh I/O Space
>> + * FD_FE00_0000h FD_FFFF_FFFFh Configuration
>> + * FE_0000_0000h FE_1FFF_FFFFh Extended Configuration/Device Messages
>> + * FE_2000_0000h FF_FFFF_FFFFh Reserved
>> + *
>> + * See AMD IOMMU spec, section 2.1.2 "IOMMU Logical Topology",
>> + * Table 3: Special Address Controls (GPA) for more information.
>> + */
>> +#define AMD_HT_START 0xfd00000000UL
>> +#define AMD_HT_END 0xffffffffffUL
>> +#define AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START (AMD_HT_END + 1)
>> +#define AMD_HT_SIZE (AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START - AMD_HT_START)
>> +
>> +static void pc_set_amd_above_4g_mem_start(PCMachineState *pcms,
>> + hwaddr maxusedaddr)
>> +{
>> + X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
>> + hwaddr maxphysaddr;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Relocating ram-above-4G requires more than TCG_PHYS_ADDR_BITS (40).
>> + * So make sure phys-bits is required to be appropriately sized in order
>> + * to proceed with the above-4g-region relocation and thus boot.
>> + */
>> + maxphysaddr = ((hwaddr)1 << X86_CPU(first_cpu)->phys_bits) - 1;
>> + if (maxphysaddr < maxusedaddr) {
>> + error_report("Address space limit 0x%"PRIx64" < 0x%"PRIx64
>> + " phys-bits too low (%u) cannot avoid AMD HT range",
>> + maxphysaddr, maxusedaddr, X86_CPU(first_cpu)->phys_bits);
>> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>> + }
>> +
>> + x86ms->above_4g_mem_start = AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START;
>> +}
>> +
>> void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
>> MemoryRegion *system_memory,
>> MemoryRegion *rom_memory,
>> @@ -897,6 +953,7 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
>> PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
>> X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
>> hwaddr cxl_base, cxl_resv_end = 0;
>> + X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(first_cpu);
>>
>> assert(machine->ram_size == x86ms->below_4g_mem_size +
>> x86ms->above_4g_mem_size);
>> @@ -904,6 +961,29 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
>> linux_boot = (machine->kernel_filename != NULL);
>>
>> /*
>> + * The HyperTransport range close to the 1T boundary is unique to AMD
>> + * hosts with IOMMUs enabled. Restrict the ram-above-4g relocation
>> + * to above 1T to AMD vCPUs only.
>> + */
>> + if (IS_AMD_CPU(&cpu->env) && x86ms->above_4g_mem_size) {
>
> it has the same issue as pc_max_used_gpa(), i.e.
> x86ms->above_4g_mem_size != 0
> doesn't mean that there isn't any memory above 4Gb nor that there aren't
> any MMIO (sgx/cxl/pci64hole), that's was the reason we were are considering
> max_used_gpa
>
Argh yes, you are right. I see it now.
> I'd prefer to keep pc_max_used_gpa(),
> idea but make it work for above cases and be more generic (i.e. not to be
> tied to AMD only) since 'pc_max_used_gpa() < physbits'
Are you also indirectly suggesting here that the check inside
pc_set_amd_above_4g_mem_start() should be moved into pc_memory_init()
given that it's orthogonal to this issue. ISTR that you suggested this
at some point. If so, then there's probably very little reason to keep
pc_set_amd_above_4g_mem_start() around.
> applies to equally
> to AMD and Intel (and to trip it, one just have to configure small enough
> physbits or large enough hotpluggable RAM/CXL/PCI64HOLE)
>
I can reproduce the issue you're thinking with basic memory hotplug. Let me see
what I can come up in pc_max_used_gpa() to cover this one. I'll respond here with a proposal.
I would really love to have v7.1.0 with this issue fixed but I am not very
confident it is going to make it :(
Meanwhile, let me know if you have thoughts on this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/1b2fa957-74f6-b5a9-3fc1-65c5d68300ce@oracle.com/
I am going to assume that if no comments on the above that I'll keep things as is.
And also, whether I can retain your ack with Bernhard's suggestion here:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/0eefb382-4ac6-4335-ca61-035babb95a88@oracle.com/
>> + hwaddr maxusedaddr = pc_pci_hole64_start() + pci_hole64_size;
>> +
>> + /* Bail out if max possible address does not cross HT range */
>> + if (maxusedaddr >= AMD_HT_START) {
>> + pc_set_amd_above_4g_mem_start(pcms, maxusedaddr);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Advertise the HT region if address space covers the reserved
>> + * region or if we relocate.
>> + */
>> + if (x86ms->above_4g_mem_start == AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START ||
>> + cpu->phys_bits >= 40) {
>> + e820_add_entry(AMD_HT_START, AMD_HT_SIZE, E820_RESERVED);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> * Split single memory region and use aliases to address portions of it,
>> * done for backwards compatibility with older qemus.
>> */
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-12 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-01 16:10 [PATCH v6 00/10] i386/pc: Fix creation of >= 1010G guests on AMD systems with IOMMU Joao Martins
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] hw/i386: add 4g boundary start to X86MachineState Joao Martins
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] i386/pc: create pci-host qdev prior to pc_memory_init() Joao Martins
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] i386/pc: pass pci_hole64_size " Joao Martins
2022-07-09 20:51 ` B
2022-07-11 10:01 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-11 22:17 ` B
2022-07-12 9:27 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] i386/pc: factor out above-4g end to an helper Joao Martins
2022-07-07 12:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-07 15:14 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] i386/pc: factor out cxl range end to helper Joao Martins
2022-07-07 12:57 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-07 15:17 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] i386/pc: factor out cxl range start " Joao Martins
2022-07-07 13:00 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-07 15:18 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-11 12:47 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-11 14:28 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] i386/pc: handle unitialized mr in pc_get_cxl_range_end() Joao Martins
2022-07-07 13:05 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-07 15:21 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-11 12:58 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-11 14:32 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] i386/pc: factor out device_memory base/size to helper Joao Martins
2022-07-07 13:15 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-07 15:23 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable Joao Martins
2022-07-07 15:53 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-11 12:56 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-11 14:52 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-11 15:31 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-11 20:03 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-12 9:06 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-12 10:01 ` Joao Martins [this message]
2022-07-12 10:21 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-12 11:35 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-14 9:28 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-14 9:54 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-14 10:47 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-14 11:50 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-14 15:39 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-14 9:30 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-01 16:10 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] i386/pc: restrict AMD only enforcing of valid IOVAs to new machine type Joao Martins
2022-07-04 14:27 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-07-05 8:48 ` Joao Martins
2022-07-11 13:03 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-07-11 14:56 ` Joao Martins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2228436c-2271-ec27-96ee-67825ac1b13f@oracle.com \
--to=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ani@anisinha.ca \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).