From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db8fR-0000it-De for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:03:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db8fN-0002R0-DP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:03:13 -0400 Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= References: <1501153150-19984-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <1501153150-19984-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <5aff6da7-4ad1-64af-6445-98b8d7520b4c@amsat.org> <122bfaa5-7192-056b-541c-b5f37f871bfc@amsat.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <22d5a43a-53fe-27df-656b-d17fc187e404@amsat.org> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:03:05 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH for-2.10 3/5] target/arm: Rename cp15.c6_rgnr to pmsav7.rnr List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-arm , QEMU Developers , "patches@linaro.org" On 07/28/2017 05:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 July 2017 at 23:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> On 07/27/2017 07:43 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> >>> On 07/27/2017 07:59 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> >> [...] >>>> >>>> - u32p += env->cp15.c6_rgnr; >>>> + u32p += env->pmsav7.rnr; >>>> tlb_flush(CPU(cpu)); /* Mappings may have changed - purge! */ >>>> *u32p = value; >>>> } >>>> @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo pmsav7_cp_reginfo[] = { >>>> .readfn = pmsav7_read, .writefn = pmsav7_write, .resetfn = >>>> pmsav7_reset }, >>>> { .name = "RGNR", .cp = 15, .crn = 6, .opc1 = 0, .crm = 2, .opc2 = >>>> 0, >>> >>> >>> "RGNR" -> "RNR" >> >> >> Ah "RGNR" for -R and "RNR" for -M hmmm... still better keep the name >> matching the field, "rnr". > > It's a bit awkward, yes -- we're going to get a mismatch one way > or the other. > > In this patch I wanted only to change the field name, not > anything else (it's already a bit borderline for 2.10). Fine by me for what's worth. So either ways: Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > > thanks > -- PMM >