Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/10] pflash: Macro PFLASH_BUG() is used just once, expand

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>]

On 2/18/19 1:56 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> PFLASH_BUG()'s lone use has a suspicious smell: it prints "Possible
> BUG", which sounds like a warning, then calls exit(1), followed by
> unreachable goto reset_flash.  All this commit does is expanding the
> macro, so the smell becomes more poignant, and the macro can be
> deleted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 10 ++--------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
> index 9efa7aa9af..f73c30a3ee 100644
> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
> @@ -49,12 +49,6 @@
>  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>  #include "trace.h"
>  
> -#define PFLASH_BUG(fmt, ...) \
> -do { \
> -    fprintf(stderr, "PFLASH: Possible BUG - " fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); \
> -    exit(1); \
> -} while(0)
> -
>  /* #define PFLASH_DEBUG */
>  #ifdef PFLASH_DEBUG
>  #define DPRINTF(fmt, ...)                                   \
> @@ -624,8 +618,8 @@ static void pflash_write(PFlashCFI01 *pfl, hwaddr offset,
>                  pfl->status |= 0x80;
>              } else {
>                  DPRINTF("%s: unknown command for \"write block\"\n", __func__);
> -                PFLASH_BUG("Write block confirm");
> -                goto reset_flash;
> +                fprintf(stderr, "PFLASH: Possible BUG - Write block confirm");
> +                exit(1);

Don't you want to use hw_error here?

      hw_error("PFLASH: Possible BUG - Write block confirm");

>              }
>              break;
>          default:
>