From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Xu <anthony.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Chao P Peng <chao.p.peng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] reduce qemu's heap Rss size from 12252kB to 2752KB
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:02:03 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <236110410.1797136.1489251723081.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4712D8F4B26E034E80552F30A67BE0B1A0FC31@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Xu" <anthony.xu@intel.com>
> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Yang Zhong" <yang.zhong@intel.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: "Chao P Peng" <chao.p.peng@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 8:30:06 PM
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/2] reduce qemu's heap Rss size from 12252kB to 2752KB
>
> > > Ideally, freeing QOM object should not require a global lock.
> > > If you see any other QOM requiring a global lock, please let us know, we
> > are willing to fix it.
> >
> > All of them. When unplugging a device, the device object will be freed
> > from an RCU callback.
> >
>
> Thanks for your reply,
> Some objects may not need lock at all to be freed,
> Some objects may just need a small lock to be freed,
>
> Should we let RCU callbacks to decide which lock they need instead of
> enforcing the global lock in RCU thread?
Splitting the global lock and deciding which object requires which lock
is very, very hard.
The problem is that everything calling object_unref potentially needs the
global lock, and that includes the following call chain: object_unref
-> memory_region_unref -> flatview_destroy -> flatview_unref ->
address_space_update_topology -> memory_region_transaction_commit.
Paolo
> As for the device object, can we get the global lock inside the object
> free/destroy function for now?
>
> If we can remove the global lock inside RCU thread, we can save 9MB heap
> memory, that's a lot!
>
> Please share with us if you have other idea to do this.
>
> Thanks
> Anthony
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-11 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-10 15:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] reduce qemu's heap Rss size from 12252kB to 2752KB Yang Zhong
2017-03-10 8:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-10 16:05 ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-10 16:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-10 19:30 ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-11 17:02 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-03-10 15:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/2] " Yang Zhong
2017-03-10 9:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-10 17:40 ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-11 17:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-14 5:14 ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-14 10:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-14 21:23 ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-15 8:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-15 19:05 ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-15 20:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 2:47 ` Zhong, Yang
2017-03-16 20:02 ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-22 11:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-22 18:26 ` Xu, Anthony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=236110410.1797136.1489251723081.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony.xu@intel.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).