From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: dillaman@redhat.com
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Christian Theune <ct@flyingcircus.io>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] block/rbd: add write zeroes support
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:41:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2449ab2d-e9da-6e4e-7de5-8dd23501d27e@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+aFP1DZ2vyw8C0_=yPaYPhYFpQ9W8TszcUOBAtHLNMaATOW9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Am 14.01.21 um 20:19 schrieb Jason Dillaman:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 11:42 AM Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
>> ---
>> block/rbd.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c
>> index 2d77d0007f..27b4404adf 100644
>> --- a/block/rbd.c
>> +++ b/block/rbd.c
>> @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ typedef enum {
>> RBD_AIO_READ,
>> RBD_AIO_WRITE,
>> RBD_AIO_DISCARD,
>> - RBD_AIO_FLUSH
>> + RBD_AIO_FLUSH,
>> + RBD_AIO_WRITE_ZEROES
>> } RBDAIOCmd;
>>
>> typedef struct BDRVRBDState {
>> @@ -221,8 +222,12 @@ done:
>>
>> static void qemu_rbd_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
>> {
>> + BDRVRBDState *s = bs->opaque;
>> /* XXX Does RBD support AIO on less than 512-byte alignment? */
>> bs->bl.request_alignment = 512;
>> +#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_WRITE_ZEROES
>> + bs->bl.pwrite_zeroes_alignment = s->object_size;
> The optimal alignment is 512 bytes -- but it can safely work just fine
> down to 1 byte alignment since it will pad the request with additional
> writes if needed.
Okay and this will likely be faster than having Qemu doing that request split, right?
If we drop the alignment hint Qemu will pass the original request.
>
>> +#endif
>> }
>>
>>
>> @@ -695,6 +700,9 @@ static int qemu_rbd_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options, int flags,
>> }
>>
>> s->aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
>> +#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_WRITE_ZEROES
>> + bs->supported_zero_flags = BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP;
>> +#endif
>>
>> /* When extending regular files, we get zeros from the OS */
>> bs->supported_truncate_flags = BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE;
>> @@ -808,6 +816,11 @@ static int coroutine_fn qemu_rbd_start_co(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> case RBD_AIO_FLUSH:
>> r = rbd_aio_flush(s->image, c);
>> break;
>> +#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_WRITE_ZEROES
>> + case RBD_AIO_WRITE_ZEROES:
>> + r = rbd_aio_write_zeroes(s->image, offset, bytes, c, 0, 0);
>> + break;
>> +#endif
>> default:
>> r = -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -880,6 +893,19 @@ static int coroutine_fn qemu_rbd_co_pdiscard(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> return qemu_rbd_start_co(bs, offset, count, NULL, 0, RBD_AIO_DISCARD);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_WRITE_ZEROES
>> +static int
>> +coroutine_fn qemu_rbd_co_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
>> + int count, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
>> +{
>> + if (!(flags & BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP)) {
>> + return -ENOTSUP;
>> + }
> There is a "RBD_WRITE_ZEROES_FLAG_THICK_PROVISION" flag that you can
> use to optionally disable unmap.
I have seen that. If you want I can support for this, too. But afaik this
is only available since Octopus release?
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-27 16:42 [PATCH 0/7] block/rbd: migrate to coroutines and add write zeroes support Peter Lieven
2020-12-27 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release Peter Lieven
2020-12-27 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] block/rbd: store object_size in BDRVRBDState Peter Lieven
2020-12-27 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] block/rbd: use stored image_size in qemu_rbd_getlength Peter Lieven
2021-01-14 19:18 ` Jason Dillaman
2021-01-14 19:32 ` Peter Lieven
2020-12-27 16:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] block/rbd: add bdrv_{attach,detach}_aio_context Peter Lieven
2021-01-14 19:18 ` Jason Dillaman
2021-01-14 19:49 ` Peter Lieven
2020-12-27 16:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] block/rbd: migrate from aio to coroutines Peter Lieven
2021-01-14 19:19 ` Jason Dillaman
2021-01-14 19:39 ` Peter Lieven
2020-12-27 16:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] block/rbd: add write zeroes support Peter Lieven
2021-01-14 19:19 ` Jason Dillaman
2021-01-14 19:41 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2021-01-15 15:09 ` Jason Dillaman
2020-12-27 16:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] block/rbd: change request alignment to 1 byte Peter Lieven
2021-01-14 19:19 ` Jason Dillaman
2021-01-14 19:59 ` Peter Lieven
2021-01-15 15:27 ` Jason Dillaman
2021-01-15 15:39 ` Peter Lieven
2021-01-18 22:33 ` Jason Dillaman
2021-01-19 9:36 ` Peter Lieven
2021-01-19 14:20 ` Jason Dillaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2449ab2d-e9da-6e4e-7de5-8dd23501d27e@kamp.de \
--to=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=ct@flyingcircus.io \
--cc=dillaman@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).