From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F405CC433DB for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EA6464DFF for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:02:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3EA6464DFF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEssP-0001X6-4b for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:02:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEsqm-0000ep-Rw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:01:04 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:44093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEsql-0007Pq-6z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:01:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614168061; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=31Fq8tFp+JpVic2Lsz4dXDVNrHNsVQzy0unUbGwZufs=; b=h1YHbIZXhEil0S9Jy71020QLJujCwSlYly7BwAanO/R3owZpzekQWpmea+6nG+ZTvqGAr8 8gZKdGvBbttygRWTieygNSeGh8f0KKHk9wAs50EL5BlPJ87tsOEyshfxVfkZ0T4xoalNuH e6HRVsuJq9D77rVQ+kKXq/iF3gPk+SI= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-23-keUioYLRPuGuupNAkQvURw-1; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:00:58 -0500 X-MC-Unique: keUioYLRPuGuupNAkQvURw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id h16so460406wmq.8 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:00:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=31Fq8tFp+JpVic2Lsz4dXDVNrHNsVQzy0unUbGwZufs=; b=aQ5ovOs4g01H/nFBoYTK8lbqqIT4SC1cxP9vwmveM0LBciwClnXLVV28URBiGDpKuR xwGkHwEbxPabQG8KTcyH3+wafTuDX8iRpHBsi1TXWrjNLpXQYMQDPBXf+8OXDJ1isdvU bttznEE+ZmsJKLpKPOq8Yrsz78DQtY8XaYothUoH8XQchQMYkPtCL1yAw7SZjBCUwhlR S34HkHUrTezhac/PCrxJTV3yaTw7KoOTpVXbXLRw5NIV/1xIvtKHDujzI5zZOI2SwBxl cCaO4Z9kbzqKPS0cvaHVCuu1G06VLkzdlAfUEYbuSu6UOpjFi6m3bTmI35udheszVrGp ldgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IWp9fJ3CxMHfylbSZszpu7heydV7T1aoBB7T9/QxbV7A9seGC FhtlujZmeSDenbmvjMGmfTfClOS63uZ3lf8NuU4d4gDBikUvxlKBPTZfE1PxaNeufLSMtkcfRKp r3aHo/m+8UvvcKzs= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4e0c:: with SMTP id g12mr3493678wmh.171.1614168057189; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:00:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6eOl2PrFnQuOREDC1DD3JtWJ0jwL9X9PzyEu1s+JQMgUXRiX5GdNtt5hF43rWMo6HoEtfSA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4e0c:: with SMTP id g12mr3493665wmh.171.1614168057089; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (68.red-83-57-175.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.57.175.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i8sm3541165wry.90.2021.02.24.04.00.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:00:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] Jobs based on custom runners: add job definitions for QEMU's machines To: Cleber Rosa , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= References: <20210219215838.752547-1-crosa@redhat.com> <20210219215838.752547-5-crosa@redhat.com> <21f882ba-21db-2d45-0e74-be27e1119355@redhat.com> <20210223182539.GH987581@amachine.somewhere> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <247471f5-1b65-b93c-8c23-18857653e3b8@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:00:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210223182539.GH987581@amachine.somewhere> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=philmd@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=philmd@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Eduardo Habkost , Erik Skultety , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Andrea Bolognani , Willian Rampazzo , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , Beraldo Leal Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2/23/21 7:25 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 03:56:19PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> >> Urgh, well that's a big problem. We certainly don't want *anything* being >> placed on the custom runners without explicit opt-in, otherwise jobs run >> in the main repo have a different environment from when users run on their >> personal forks. >> >> IOW, we need anti-affinity against our custom runners really. >> > > I'm assuming Phil missed that documentation, because that's a > non-issue, really. > > Just unchecking the "Run untagged jobs" check box on the runner > configuration makes sure that the custom runners won't pickup any jobs > not *specifically* tagged for them. Can we explicit this when registering the runner instead of having to access the WebUI? $ gitlab-runner register --help --run-untagged Register to run untagged builds; defaults to 'true' when 'tag-list' is empty [$REGISTER_RUN_UNTAGGED]