From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBpt1-0004WW-2h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:48:07 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBpsw-0004W4-Jg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:48:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47212 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MBpsw-0004W1-Gv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:48:02 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:56991) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBpsv-0003GK-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:48:02 -0400 Message-Id: <25533456.1943631244033278919.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> From: Laurent Vivier Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RFC: fix fcntl support in linux-user - new try MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:47:58 +0200 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org >Hi, > >This is a new try to fix the fcntl support in linux-user. I tried to >adress all comments but as the previous version is several weeks old, >it's possible that I've missed some. > >This patch doesn't handle linux specific fcntl flags. My plan is to get >this version of the patch reviewed/fixed and then, add them if wanted. > >Thanks, >Arnaud > I didn't follow the discussion, but for target_to_host_fnctl_cmd(), why not= an array like host_to_target_signal_table[], in linux-user/signal.c ? Laurent --=20 --------------------- Laurent@vivier.eu --------------------- "Tout ce qui est impossible reste =C3=A0 accomplir" Jules Verne "Things are only impossible until they're not" Jean-Luc Picard