From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: farman@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390x:clp: implementing CLP immediate commands
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:26:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2583e99f-9551-db86-7e92-9155de06569e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5efab45a-289a-5759-d6a5-5dbe7949f4ef@redhat.com>
On 10/12/21 09:27, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17/09/2021 14.06, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> CLP immediate commands allow to query the Logical Processor
>> available on the machine and to check for a specific one.
>>
>> Let's add these commands.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h | 5 +++++
>> target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 6 ++++++
>> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
>> index 1c8ad91175..9fd0669591 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
>> @@ -156,6 +156,39 @@ out:
>> return rc;
>> }
>> +int clp_immediate_cmd(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2, uint8_t i3,
>> + uintptr_t ra)
>> +{
>> + CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
>> +
>> + switch (r2) {
>> + case 0: /* Command Check */
>> + switch (i3 & 0x07) {
>> + case CLP_LPS_PCI: /* PCI */
>> + if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
>> + setcc(cpu, 3);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + /* fallthrough */
>> + case CLP_LPS_BASE: /* Base LP */
>> + setcc(cpu, 0);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + setcc(cpu, 3);
>> + return 0;
>> + case 1: /* Command Query */
>> + env->regs[r1] = CLP_QUERY_LP_BASE;
>> + if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
>> + env->regs[r1] |= CLP_QUERY_LP_BASE >> CLP_LPS_PCI;
>> + }
>> + setcc(cpu, 0);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
>
> Just a matter of taste, but I'd rather put that into a "default:" case,
> so that the other cases could "break" instead of returning immediately.
OK, is better.
>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> All return statements return 0. Thus the return value does not really
> matter, you could also turn this into a "void" function.
Yes.
>
>> int clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
>> {
>> ClpReqHdr *reqh;
>> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
>> b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
>> index a55c448aad..07721b08da 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
>> @@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ typedef struct ZpciFib {
>> int pci_dereg_irqs(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev);
>> void pci_dereg_ioat(S390PCIIOMMU *iommu);
>> int clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra);
>> +#define CLP_LPS_BASE 0
>> +#define CLP_LPS_PCI 2
>> +#define CLP_QUERY_LP_BASE (1UL << 63)
>> +int clp_immediate_cmd(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2, uint8_t i3,
>> + uintptr_t ra);
>> int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2,
>> uintptr_t ra);
>> int pcistg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2,
>> uintptr_t ra);
>> int rpcit_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2,
>> uintptr_t ra);
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
>> index 0a5f2aced2..af1316372d 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
>> @@ -1345,7 +1345,13 @@ static uint64_t get_base_disp_rsy(S390CPU *cpu,
>> struct kvm_run *run,
>> static int kvm_clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> {
>> + uint8_t r1 = (run->s390_sieic.ipb & 0x00f00000) >> 20;
>> uint8_t r2 = (run->s390_sieic.ipb & 0x000f0000) >> 16;
>> + uint8_t i3 = (run->s390_sieic.ipb & 0xff000000) >> 24;
>> +
>> + if (i3 & 0x80) {
>> + return clp_immediate_cmd(cpu, r1, r2, i3, RA_IGNORED);
>> + }
>> if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
>> return clp_service_call(cpu, r2, RA_IGNORED);
>>
>
> Could you please adjust the TCG part accordingly, too?
>
> Thomas
>
>
Thanks for the comments,
I adjust TCG too.
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-12 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-17 12:06 [PATCH 0/1] s390x:clp: implementing CLP immediate commands Pierre Morel
2021-09-17 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Pierre Morel
2021-09-17 13:55 ` Matthew Rosato
2021-10-12 7:27 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-12 14:26 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2583e99f-9551-db86-7e92-9155de06569e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).