From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
armbru@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] blockdev: avoid acquiring AioContext lock twice at do_drive_backup()
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:57:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26ff362d-10a8-bcca-0b05-a4d51e88ad37@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v9twwn8r.fsf@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2617 bytes --]
On 13.09.19 11:37, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>
> Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 12.09.19 18:16, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>>> do_drive_backup() acquires the AioContext lock of the corresponding
>>> BlockDriverState. This is not a problem when it's called from
>>> qmp_drive_backup(), but drive_backup_prepare() also acquires the lock
>>> before calling it.
>>>
>>> This change adds a BlockDriverState argument to do_drive_backup(),
>>> which is used to signal that the context lock is already acquired and
>>> to save a couple of redundant calls.
>>
>> But those redundant calls don’t really hurt (it’s just bdrv_lookup_bs(),
>> as far as I can tell). Wouldn’t it be simpler to just release the
>> context lock in drive_backup_prepare() before calling do_drive_backup()?
>> The BDS is drained anyway.
>
> Redundant calls rarely hurt, they're just redundant ;-)
If they’re expensive and in a hot path, they hurt.
>> On top of that, do_backup_common() calls bdrv_try_set_aio_context() to
>> bring the target into the source’s AioContext. However, this function
>> must be called with the old AioContext held, and the new context not held.
>
> Is this documented somewhere? I see nothing in the function declaration
> nor definition.
>
> I'm starting to get the feeling that the block layer is riddled with
> unwritten rules and assumptions that makes every change a lot harder
> than it should be.
It is written, it’s just that it’s written in
bdrv_set_aio_context_ignore()’s definition.
Yes, we should document it directly for bdrv_try_set_aio_context(), too,
because that’s what external callers are much more likely to use.
>> Currently, it’s called exactly the other way around: With the new
>> context held, but the old one not held.
>>
>> So I think it indeed actually makes more sense to release the AioContext
>> before calling do_drive_backup(), and to move the
>> bdrv_try_set_aio_context() call for target_bs to the callers of
>> do_backup_common() (where they have not yet taken the AioContext lock).
>
> OK. I see this also happens in external_snapshot_prepare() and
> qmp_drive_mirror() too. I guess we should fix these too.
>
> In qmp_drive_mirror(), would it be safe to delay the acquisition of any
> context until just before the blockdev_mirror_common()?
From mirror’s perspective I think so, but I don’t think it’s safe to
access any of a BDS’s fields without having acquired its AioContext.
(In fact, I wonder whether we should acquire the context even before
bdrv_op_is_blocked()...)
Max
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-13 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 16:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] blockdev: avoid acquiring AioContext lock twice at do_drive_backup() Sergio Lopez
2019-09-13 7:52 ` Max Reitz
2019-09-13 9:37 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-13 9:57 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-09-13 10:15 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-09-13 11:10 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26ff362d-10a8-bcca-0b05-a4d51e88ad37@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).