From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boGSv-0001nw-Kz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:56:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boGSs-0006W0-CB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:56:01 -0400 Received: from mx5-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.37]:43286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boGSs-0006VM-39 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:55:58 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:55:53 -0400 (EDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Message-ID: <274086782.1698878.1474836953815.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4f7bb8d9-a9da-5c06-a0b7-20dea8b802f8@redhat.com> References: <20160923153612.GU3233@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160923184040-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <29325c65-7ee6-22ed-31b3-211bcaceef50@redhat.com> <4f7bb8d9-a9da-5c06-a0b7-20dea8b802f8@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vhost-user-test failure List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Maxime Coquelin Hi ----- Original Message ----- > This time with Marc-Andr=C3=A9 in cc:... >=20 > On 09/23/2016 07:40 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > > > > > On 09/23/2016 05:41 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:36:12PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I hit a weird vhost-user-test failure on travis-ci recently, on a > >>> branch where I didn't touch any vhost-related code. From a quick > >>> look at the code, it looks like the vhost-user code is unhappy to > >>> see a disconnected socket. > >>> > >>> I wasn't able to reproduce it. It seems to be a hard to reproduce > >>> race between vhost-user code and socket reconnection. > >>> > >>> The failure can be seen at: > >>> > >>> https://travis-ci.org/ehabkost/qemu-hacks/jobs/162077239 > >> > >> Maxime looked at something similiar. Any idea? > > No, not really. > > Marc-Andr=C3=A9 contributed a lot to these tests, I add him in cc: in c= ase > > he has an idea. > > > > I will have a look in the mean time. > > I am unable to reproduce locally (over 500x iterations), and I have no clue= what's going on: the warnings there aren't the problem (that's the main re= ason why we use the subprocess, to silence those). Do you have a local repr= oducer or is it only on travis? Afaik, there are no other reports of this t= est failing, are you sure its not related to changes on your branch? thanks