From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCBDC433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6722764FA8 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:51:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6722764FA8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58254 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKH2E-0000eR-9v for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 03:51:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKH0s-00088V-RG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 03:49:46 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:47768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKH0p-0007Zs-AY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 03:49:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1615452581; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/7aMfjMgaTNlD5dnl6siK92Xg5T/Q7V+P7jl1eU2280=; b=g1FOVdQ5qoZ9YW3MU5sikKSCUaoZDpxc6M/ZyIQAMqPZJa9URyUarZTMKD8HFpSwKOZ6ND njHAhEy+xpi+V/7h8rSVrgZLRUGxSF4uqVl61AgA14JNxAIyTJw4+ikATMIDKG8GD9YPbH aBbRlgfdGoRHFr6lJYOfhomRObyar6Y= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-319-H2FGwuFkO5uoU6VyZEImvQ-1; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 03:49:39 -0500 X-MC-Unique: H2FGwuFkO5uoU6VyZEImvQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id v27so3657533ejq.0 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:49:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/7aMfjMgaTNlD5dnl6siK92Xg5T/Q7V+P7jl1eU2280=; b=fm/Pq0hqOP/aYgI2mmK81GyH+EEWlNuH96QAPKxC/WtmL1hBQPkfy3ULYpvwaIyMe7 dhnvrq5iecPXFNrRUrHPAW+VKpfJsazx6z94jtp6aN4vAP2ye/PU6Yy1dlPaLZqehyZB BuGdVtrDpq4v9tM3pb0tWCGp7NVcxQeB2nddNZOjS5W/wtlAqVTZFHgvISCpmupigURM s9prYomrq6uf3vrHaExLQluD+3/w2lGGqHxiH8mnIxhXoFkkQ+I1Q4EMu6PWiQ2gbHLt mF/5nJBpjpr9hqCiWP/hZ3kPKo9OlvXjkDFV7dxnbwEKKdGEpncZjjyJbE0pcioZETCA 3iiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530batkMjfK88YSkbkkDoosAlfHWNLnWYcxEVVuDEaxoKwWHSKfk +SgcyVfFf6oqQfhDblkfVjXhDVHTJ/wN3mlLKH/EWwJffJMk/wk162HirG54nF9BHtXiZ2EDjJo 6A/1ZgHQnyZymxa8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f296:: with SMTP id gu22mr2027340ejb.20.1615452578492; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:49:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJCY2nmQ49yD3Rh9tbr4ygqoO/L+9va38Yp3qj7JbVPchI9mVwrG4d6gCqeXrN1jmHohqLYw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f296:: with SMTP id gu22mr2027322ejb.20.1615452578272; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:49:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j25sm903772edy.9.2021.03.11.00.49.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:49:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/30] qapi/qom: QAPIfy --object and object-add To: Kevin Wolf References: <20210308165440.386489-1-kwolf@redhat.com> <90130a0c-7f96-f344-b185-b790c5d6b78a@redhat.com> <20210310173044.GF6076@merkur.fritz.box> <20210311084502.GB9008@merkur.fritz.box> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <27ad5b7e-a02a-3d89-1df5-2704db0cf2c8@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:49:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210311084502.GB9008@merkur.fritz.box> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.243, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, Peter Krempa , ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, Markus Armbruster , jasowang@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 11/03/21 09:45, Kevin Wolf wrote: > I think it's only patch 29 and 30 that we would have to drop, actually. > > Unfortunately, that still removes one of the most immediately useful > features, which is non-scalar properties for -object in the system > emulator. But of course, a lot better than not merging it at all. > >> Who is going to include this series in the next pull request, Markus or >> myself? The time is ticking for soft freeze. > QOM is probably the right subsystem, so that would be you. Or I can just > merge it myself as long as everyone is fine with it. > > Eric has some minor comments that I think could be addressed while > applying the series. Or should I send a v4 for that (and for dropping > patches 29 and 30)? I'd say just send a pull request. :) Paolo