qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
To: Corey Bryant <coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 1/4] Adding new syscalls (bugzilla 855162)
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:46:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2826252.GgZdGKF9jS@sifl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5093DC1D.506@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Friday, November 02, 2012 10:43:41 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 10:38 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Friday, November 02, 2012 10:10:02 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> >> On Friday, November 02, 2012 09:48:55 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
> >>> On 11/01/2012 05:43 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 03:55:29 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> >>>>> According to the bug 855162[0] - there's the need of adding new
> >>>>> syscalls
> >>>>> to the whitelist whenn using Qemu with Libvirt.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> [0] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855162
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> v2: Adding new syscalls to the list: readlink, rt_sigpending, and
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>       rt_sigtimedwait
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Reported-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>    qemu-seccomp.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >>>>>    1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>> 
> >>>> I had an opportunity to test this patchset on a F17 machine using QEMU
> >>>> 1.2
> >>>> and unfortunately it still fails.  I'm using a relatively basic guest
> >>>> configuration running F16, the details are documented in the RH BZ that
> >>>> Eduardo mentioned in the patch description.
> >>> 
> >>> Paul, Here's the latest diff for the whitelist.  We're looking to get
> >>> the patches out in the next few days after a bit more testing.
> >> 
> >> Okay, thanks for the updated list ... I'm rebuilding QEMU right now and
> >> I'll report back with the results later today.
> > 
> > Sadly, no luck, it still fails.
> 
> Hmm, let me send you the current patch set off-line, which includes
> debug support to write the failing syscall out.  If you don't mind could
> you try it out?

Sure, no problem.

On a related note, I think it would be a *really* good idea to also submit the 
debug code upstream, just in a disabled state by default.  You could either 
bracket it with #ifdefs or get fancy and allow it at runtime with '-sandbox 
debug' or something similar.

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-02 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-23  5:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 1/4] Adding new syscalls (bugzilla 855162) Eduardo Otubo
2012-10-23  5:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 2/4] Setting "-sandbox on" as deafult Eduardo Otubo
2012-10-23  5:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 3/4] Support for "double whitelist" filters Eduardo Otubo
2012-10-23 15:10   ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-24 20:06     ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-10-25 20:16     ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-11-02 21:29   ` Paul Moore
2012-11-02 22:00     ` Corey Bryant
2012-11-02 22:14       ` Paul Moore
2012-11-05 14:39         ` Corey Bryant
2012-11-05 21:58           ` Paul Moore
2012-11-05 22:26             ` Corey Bryant
2012-11-02 22:01     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-23  5:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 4/4] Warning messages on net devices hotplug Eduardo Otubo
2012-10-23 15:59   ` Corey Bryant
2012-10-23 16:39     ` Eric Blake
2012-11-01 21:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 1/4] Adding new syscalls (bugzilla 855162) Paul Moore
2012-11-02  2:29   ` Eduardo Otubo
2012-11-02 14:10     ` Paul Moore
2012-11-02 13:48   ` Corey Bryant
2012-11-02 14:10     ` Paul Moore
2012-11-02 14:38       ` Paul Moore
2012-11-02 14:43         ` Corey Bryant
2012-11-02 14:46           ` Paul Moore [this message]
2012-11-02 14:49             ` Corey Bryant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2826252.GgZdGKF9jS@sifl \
    --to=pmoore@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).