From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekEYt-0003z0-Fj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 14:42:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekEYq-0004Eg-DJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 14:42:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pl0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22f]:38129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekEYq-0004EI-5N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 14:42:16 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 13so1919319plb.5 for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:42:16 -0800 (PST) References: <1518053328-34687-1-git-send-email-mjc@sifive.com> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <2832ff22-e0c8-85b9-c0ce-15b0cc3cdc72@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 11:42:11 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1518053328-34687-1-git-send-email-mjc@sifive.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/23] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Clark , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Bastian Koppelmann , Palmer Dabbelt , Sagar Karandikar , RISC-V Patches On 02/07/2018 05:28 PM, Michael Clark wrote: > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/Makefile.objs > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/riscv_elf.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/riscv_htif.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/sifive_clint.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/sifive_e300.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/sifive_plic.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/sifive_prci.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/sifive_test.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/sifive_u500.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/sifive_uart.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/spike_v1_09.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/spike_v1_10.c > create mode 100644 hw/riscv/virt.c I have no plans to review these last 9 patches. They all look plausible to me, but I'm not so up-to-date on best practices within hw/. r~