From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Gabriel Brookman <brookmangabriel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 06/10] target/arm: add canonical and no-address tag logic
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 17:18:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <288583e6-42ae-45ba-99d4-376d379a940d@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251116-feat-mte4-v2-6-9a7122b7fa76@gmail.com>
On 11/17/25 02:40, Gabriel Brookman wrote:
> This feature causes tag checks to compare logical address tags against
> their canonical form rather than against allocation tags. Described in
> the ARM ARM section "Logical Address Tagging".
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Brookman <brookmangabriel@gmail.com>
> ---
> target/arm/internals.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> target/arm/tcg/mte_helper.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
> index 75677945af..5f0bcdaaac 100644
> --- a/target/arm/internals.h
> +++ b/target/arm/internals.h
> @@ -1633,6 +1633,46 @@ static inline bool tcma_check(uint32_t desc, int bit55, int ptr_tag)
> return tcma && match;
> }
>
> +/* Return whether or not the second nibble of a VA matches bit 55. */
> +static inline bool tag_is_canonical(int ptr_tag, int bit55)
> +{
> + return ((ptr_tag + bit55) & 0xf) == 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return true if mtx bits mean that the access is canonically checked. */
> +static inline bool mtx_check(CPUARMState *env, bool bit55)
> +{
> + /*
> + * the MTX bits used in EL0 are those used in whichever EL is used
> + * for the supervisor. The EL that contains the supervisor uses
> + * bits 60 and 61 (MTX0 and MTX1), while the other ELs that aren't
> + * used by the supervisor.
> + */
> + int el = arm_current_el(env);
> + if (el == 0) {
> + if (HCR_E2H & env->cp15.hcr_el2) {
> + return (1l << (60 + bit55)) & env->cp15.tcr_el[2];
> + } else {
> + return (1l << (60 + bit55)) & env->cp15.tcr_el[1];
> + }
> + } else if (el == 1) {
> + if (HCR_E2H & env->cp15.hcr_el2) {
> + g_assert_not_reached();
> + } else {
> + return (1l << (60 + bit55)) & env->cp15.tcr_el[1];
> + }
> + } else if (el == 2) {
> + if (HCR_E2H & env->cp15.hcr_el2) {
> + return (1l << (60 + bit55)) & env->cp15.tcr_el[2];
> + } else {
> + return (1l << 33) & env->cp15.tcr_el[2];
> + }
> + } else if (el == 3) {
> + return (1l << 33) & env->cp15.tcr_el[3];
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
Again, you can't touch hcr_el2 directly.
In this case, you want to use regime_tcr, using the mmu_idx value from mte_probe_int.
Use arm_mmu_idx_to_el() instead of arm_current_el(), so that UNPRIV acceses are handled
correctly.
Using "l" is always wrong; always ll or preferably ull.
Though really defines for
bit55 ? TCR_MTX1 : TCR_MTX0
wouldn't go amiss.
You seam to be missing a check for FEAT_MTE_NO_ADDRESS_TAGS or FEAT_MTE_CANONICAL_TAGS.
> +
> /*
> * For TBI, ideally, we would do nothing. Proper behaviour on fault is
> * for the tag to be present in the FAR_ELx register. But for user-only
> diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/mte_helper.c b/target/arm/tcg/mte_helper.c
> index f9fd6fd408..513ee8d6a1 100644
> --- a/target/arm/tcg/mte_helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/tcg/mte_helper.c
> @@ -799,6 +799,10 @@ static int mte_probe_int(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t desc, uint64_t ptr,
> return 1;
> }
>
> + if (mtx_check(env, bit55)) {
> + return tag_is_canonical(ptr_tag, bit55);
> + }
This could use a comment like
If mtx is enabled, then the access is MemTag_CanonicallyTagged,
otherwise it is MemTag_AllocationTagged. See AArch64.CheckTag.
> + if (mtx_check(env, bit55)) {
> + if (tag_is_canonical(ptr_tag, bit55)) {
> + goto done;
> + }
> + mte_check_fail(env, desc, ptr, ra);
> + }
Likewise.
In the pseudocode, walkparams.mtx is used in AArch64.VAIsOutOfRange, which is part of
get_phys_addr_lpae() here:
/*
* We determined the region when collecting the parameters, but we
* have not yet validated that the address is valid for the region.
* Extract the top bits and verify that they all match select.
*
* For aa32, if inputsize == addrsize, then we have selected the
* region by exclusion in aa32_va_parameters and there is no more
* validation to do here.
*/
if (inputsize < addrsize) {
uint64_t top_bits = sextract64(address, inputsize,
addrsize - inputsize);
if (-top_bits != param.select) {
/* The gap between the two regions is a Translation fault */
goto do_translation_fault;
}
}
There is also a use in AArch64.S1DisabledOutput, which would correspond to
get_phys_addr_disabled(), which is relevant before
if (extract64(address, pamax, addrtop - pamax + 1) != 0) {
fi->type = ARMFault_AddressSize;
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 1:40 [PATCH RFC v2 00/10] target/arm: add support for MTE4 Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] target/arm: explicitly disable MTE4 for max Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-17 9:48 ` Richard Henderson
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/10] tests/tcg: added test for MTE FAR Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-17 9:51 ` Richard Henderson
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/10] target/arm: add TCSO bitmasks to SCTLR Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-17 15:14 ` Richard Henderson
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/10] target/arm: add FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY logic Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-17 15:26 ` Richard Henderson
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/10] tests/tcg: added test for MTE write-only Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-17 15:39 ` Richard Henderson
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/10] target/arm: add canonical and no-address tag logic Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-17 16:18 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/10] target/arm: ldg on canonical tag loads the tag Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-17 16:26 ` Richard Henderson
2025-11-18 17:31 ` brookmangabriel
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/10] target/arm: storing to canonical tags faults Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-19 7:48 ` Richard Henderson
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/10] tests/tcg: added test for MTE canonical and NAT Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-19 7:49 ` Richard Henderson
2025-11-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/10] docs: added MTE4 features to docs Gabriel Brookman
2025-11-19 7:51 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=288583e6-42ae-45ba-99d4-376d379a940d@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=brookmangabriel@gmail.com \
--cc=gustavo.romero@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).