From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOgUS-0005b6-NH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:38:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FOgUM-0005YE-Rd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:38:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOgUM-0005Y8-Lb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:37:54 -0500 Received: from [193.43.91.203] (helo=espresso.foo-projects.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FOgWN-0004fm-Cz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:39:59 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by espresso.foo-projects.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA621F706D for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:37:51 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:37:50 +0000 From: sofar Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add gcc 4.0 support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <293776a142e45be325f67eddf9494d96@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:24:59 +0200, "Pascal Terjan" w= rote: > On 3/29/06, John Davidorff Pell wrote: >> P.S. Why does the list set the reply-to header, isn't that supposed >> to be a Bad Thing=C2=99? >=20 > Only according to some people :) > I hate when I reply to a list and the message goes to the guy and not > to the list... (If someone enforces Reply-To in his mail I think > however that it should remain). I kind of like it and wish that some lists would allow me to set it as a = user-preference - there are so many lists and I really never ever want to= reply to *just* the person (ever, ever, ever). reply-to the list is good for me Auke