From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] s390x/mmu: Implement ESOP-2 and access-exception-fetch/store-indication facility
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:30:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a30f489-8ec7-26de-b6b4-98d73030b7fd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190926101627.23376-3-david@redhat.com>
On 26.09.19 12:16, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We already implement ESOP-1. For ESOP-2, we only have to indicate all
> protection exceptions properly. Due to EDAT-1, we already indicate DAT
> exceptions properly. We don't trigger KCP/ALCP/IEP exceptions yet.
>
> So all we have to do is set the TEID (TEC) to the right values
> (bit 56, 60, 61) in case of LAP.
>
> We don't have any side-effects (e.g., no guarded-storage facility),
> therefore, bit 64 of the TEID (TEC) is always 0.
>
> We always have to indicate whether it is a fetch or a store for all access
> exceptions. This is only missing for LAP exceptions.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/s390x/mmu_helper.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
> index 54f54137ec..8abc5d31d8 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
> @@ -384,7 +384,9 @@ int mmu_translate(CPUS390XState *env, target_ulong vaddr, int rw, uint64_t asc,
> *flags |= PAGE_WRITE_INV;
> if (is_low_address(vaddr) && rw == MMU_DATA_STORE) {
> if (exc) {
> - trigger_access_exception(env, PGM_PROTECTION, ILEN_AUTO, 0);
> + /* LAP sets bit 56 */
> + tec |= 0x80;
> + trigger_access_exception(env, PGM_PROTECTION, ilen, tec);
> }
> return -EACCES;
> }
> @@ -540,6 +542,10 @@ void s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(S390CPU *cpu, uintptr_t ra)
> int mmu_translate_real(CPUS390XState *env, target_ulong raddr, int rw,
> target_ulong *addr, int *flags)
> {
> + /* Code accesses have an undefined ilc, let's use 2 bytes. */
> + const int ilen = (rw == MMU_INST_FETCH) ? 2 : ILEN_AUTO;
> + uint64_t tec = (raddr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) |
> + (rw == MMU_DATA_STORE ? FS_WRITE : FS_READ);
> const bool lowprot_enabled = env->cregs[0] & CR0_LOWPROT;
>
> *flags = PAGE_READ | PAGE_WRITE | PAGE_EXEC;
> @@ -547,7 +553,9 @@ int mmu_translate_real(CPUS390XState *env, target_ulong raddr, int rw,
> /* see comment in mmu_translate() how this works */
> *flags |= PAGE_WRITE_INV;
> if (is_low_address(raddr) && rw == MMU_DATA_STORE) {
> - trigger_access_exception(env, PGM_PROTECTION, ILEN_AUTO, 0);
> + /* LAP sets bit 56 */
> + tec |= 0x80;
> + trigger_access_exception(env, PGM_PROTECTION, ilen, tec);
I'll drop the ilen change from this patch again as it is handled
properly when filling the TLB and Richard is about to rework that either
way.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-27 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-26 10:16 [PATCH v1 0/5] s390x/mmu: Implement more facilities David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] s390x/mmu: Add EDAT2 translation support David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26 10:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-01 8:41 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-01 8:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-01 8:55 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-01 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] s390x/mmu: Implement ESOP-2 and access-exception-fetch/store-indication facility David Hildenbrand
2019-09-27 12:30 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-10-01 8:48 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-26 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] s390x/mmu: Implement Instruction-Execution-Protection Facility David Hildenbrand
2019-10-01 9:06 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-26 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] s390x/cpumodel: Prepare for changes of QEMU model David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] s390x/cpumodel: Add new TCG features to QEMU cpu model David Hildenbrand
2019-10-07 17:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-04 13:23 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] s390x/mmu: Implement more facilities David Hildenbrand
2019-10-07 17:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-09 10:33 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a30f489-8ec7-26de-b6b4-98d73030b7fd@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).