From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MtSvQ-0006tN-DI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:10:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MtSvL-0006n1-Mr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:10:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33205 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MtSvL-0006mt-Ec for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:10:51 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.211.176]:52931) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MtSvL-000167-6A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:10:51 -0400 Received: by ywh6 with SMTP id 6so377883ywh.4 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:10:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4AC4A487.1050003@us.ibm.com> References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com> <4AC4A487.1050003@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:10:50 -0700 Message-ID: <2a50f7880910011410u6afbb658hf99839fdb3e7bab1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Release plan for 0.12.0 From: Jordan Justen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 05:45, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Natalia Portillo wrote: >> >> for target-i386 and target-x86_64: >> >> o EFI firmware emulation (as a machine or command line option) >> o OS/2 1.x support > > AFAIK, no one is actually working on these. =A0EFI is also not terribly u= seful > without a CSM and I suspect porting SeaBIOS to tiano core is going to be = a > big effort. Several Linux distributions are getting UEFI support ironed out now, so UEFI can be used without a CSM. QEMU support for UEFI could help the Linux distributions to enable UEFI support... Windows Vista and 7 support UEFI on x64-64, but I've not been able to boot either with the OVMF project yet. (I suspect that the video driver might not be initializing correctly, but the root cause of the failure is n= ot yet known.) > > -- > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > >