From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] s390x: reset handling for ccw devices
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 15:29:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a6f6a2a-ddaf-27ae-de04-581dcc67fdd0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180507155130.21085-1-cohuck@redhat.com>
On 05/07/2018 05:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Friday, Thomas noticed some problems with 3270 devices. One result
> was "s390x/css: disabled subchannels cannot be status pending", but
> a reboot did not cure the previous broken status. Turns out that 3270
> devices are missing a reset handler.
>
> This series cleans up reset handling a bit and makes sure that the base
> ccw device class provides a subchannel reset handler. I'm currently
> not sure what we should do with vfio-ccw, so the behaviour there is
> left unchanged.
Had a look, and LGTM (will tag separately) modulo what follows here. I'm
a bit concerned about vfio-ccw not being made compliant to this new
he reset of CCWDeviceClass is taking care of resetting the subchannel data
structures. This feels like introducing a common abstraction
to me, but then some things bother me.
In particular the the pim, the lpm and the pam set in css_reset_sch
seems to suit only devices that use the virtual chp. That
is it ain't suits any CCWDevice instance.
Do you plan to tackle vfio-ccw reset?
>
> Cornelia Huck (2):
> virtio-ccw: common reset handler
> s390x/ccw: make sure all ccw devices are properly reset
>
> hw/s390x/ccw-device.c | 8 ++++++++
> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 20 ++++++--------------
> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-08 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-07 15:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] s390x: reset handling for ccw devices Cornelia Huck
2018-05-07 15:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] virtio-ccw: common reset handler Cornelia Huck
2018-05-07 19:21 ` Thomas Huth
2018-05-07 19:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-05-08 13:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Halil Pasic
2018-05-07 15:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] s390x/ccw: make sure all ccw devices are properly reset Cornelia Huck
2018-05-08 5:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2018-05-08 7:17 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-05-08 7:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-08 13:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Halil Pasic
2018-05-08 14:01 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-08 12:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] s390x: reset handling for ccw devices Cornelia Huck
2018-05-08 13:29 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2018-05-08 13:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-08 14:24 ` Halil Pasic
2018-05-08 15:22 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a6f6a2a-ddaf-27ae-de04-581dcc67fdd0@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).