From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYC1g-0007LR-IT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:29:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYC1d-0003QC-DS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:29:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYC1d-0003Py-8A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:29:41 -0500 References: <20170127193504.32290-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <8d16a464-18c0-feb6-d1dd-1a9e3d8c84aa@redhat.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <2aac246f-995e-d0bf-7d60-eb3b71a01b32@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:29:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/41] Misc patches for 2017-01-27 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers On 01/30/17 13:57, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 30 January 2017 at 12:33, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Peter, >> >> On 01/27/17 20:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> The following changes since commit 29ba0cdc1fd1300f910d150c03a0f74236083bf7: >>> >>> Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qapi-2017-01-27' into staging (2017-01-27 15:20:08 +0000) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git tags/for-upstream >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 6da67de6803e93cbb7e93ac3497865832f8c00ea: >>> >>> memory: don't sign-extend 32-bit writes (2017-01-27 18:08:00 +0100) >>> >> >> Can you please pull this v2? > > I am currently processing it, yes. Paolo only sent it to the list Apologies, I missed that. > late on Friday evening, and I don't generally work weekends, I didn't try to imply that you should have -- I also don't check my work email over the weekend, on purpose. I check the occasional public list archive, maybe. > so it's not like this has been lying around for a long time... Yeah I was conflicted whether I should ping you or not... The very first version of the patches goes back to October 2015; I may have gotten over-enthusiastic about the feature being finally merged, and possibly made the wrong call. Sorry. (BTW I know about , and for the v1 pull req, I did notice quickly enough the conflict ("Failed in applying to current master"), even before reading your feedback on-list; but for v2, patchew only says "Series not complete".) It's difficult to ask politely in email... I tend to start with apologizing and various disclaimers, saying "please" and "thank you" profusely, but I've also been told that I should be more "assertive"... Sigh. Thank you anyway, and sorry about the poke. It was meant in good faith. Laszlo