qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
	eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
	nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
	berrange@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 17/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 14:02:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b3c224e-cfa2-df8f-443c-d49ced4ae29b@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e86317ad-74d6-937e-5b48-f3ee93171ded@kaod.org>


On 4/4/23 11:19, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 4/3/23 18:29, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> A dedicated CPU in vertical polarization can only have
>> a high entitlement.
>> Let's check this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/avocado/s390_topology.py | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py 
>> b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
>> index f12f0ae148..6a41f08897 100644
>> --- a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
>> +++ b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
>> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ class S390CPUTopology(LinuxKernelTest):
>>       The polarization is changed on a request from the guest.
>>       """
>>       timeout = 90
>> +    skip_basis = False
>
> This should come through its own patch.

OK, this is more a debug help, I wonder if I should not just remove it


>
>
>>       def check_topology(self, c, s, b, d, e, t):
>> @@ -116,12 +117,14 @@ def system_init(self):
>>           exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern(self,
>>                   '/bin/cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching', '0')
>>   +    @skipIf(skip_basis, 'skipping basis tests')
>>       def test_single(self):
>>           self.kernel_init()
>>           self.vm.launch()
>>           self.wait_for_console_pattern('no job control')
>>           self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
>>   +    @skipIf(skip_basis, 'skipping basis tests')
>>       def test_default(self):
>>           """
>>           This test checks the implicite topology.
>> @@ -147,6 +150,7 @@ def test_default(self):
>>           self.check_topology(11, 2, 1, 0, 'medium', False)
>>           self.check_topology(12, 0, 0, 1, 'medium', False)
>>   +    @skipIf(skip_basis, 'skipping basis tests')
>>       def test_move(self):
>>           """
>>           This test checks the topology modification by moving a CPU
>> @@ -167,6 +171,7 @@ def test_move(self):
>>           self.assertEqual(res['return'], {})
>>           self.check_topology(0, 2, 0, 0, 'low', False)
>>   +    @skipIf(skip_basis, 'skipping basis tests')
>>       def test_hotplug(self):
>>           """
>>           This test verifies that a CPU defined with '-device' 
>> command line
>> @@ -184,6 +189,7 @@ def test_hotplug(self):
>>             self.check_topology(10, 2, 1, 0, 'medium', False)
>>   +    @skipIf(skip_basis, 'skipping basis tests')
>>       def test_hotplug_full(self):
>>           """
>>           This test verifies that a hotplugged fully defined with 
>> '-device'
>> @@ -202,6 +208,7 @@ def test_hotplug_full(self):
>>           self.wait_for_console_pattern('no job control')
>>           self.check_topology(1, 1, 1, 1, 'medium', False)
>>   +    @skipIf(skip_basis, 'skipping basis tests')
>>       def test_polarisation(self):
>>           """
>>           This test verifies that QEMU modifies the entitlement 
>> change after
>> @@ -231,7 +238,7 @@ def test_polarisation(self):
>>             self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
>>   -    def test_set_cpu_topology_entitlement(self):
>> +    def test_entitlement(self):
>
> May be introduce the correct name in the first patch.


right.


Thanks,

Pierre



  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-04 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-03 16:28 [PATCH v19 00/21] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 01/21] s390x/cpu topology: add s390 specifics to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  7:03   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 12:26     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-04 12:35       ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 14:04         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-11 12:27           ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-17  9:15             ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-18 15:57       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-19  9:46         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-18  8:53   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-18 10:01     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-18 10:15       ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-18 12:28         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-18 12:38       ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-18 13:52         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-18 14:58           ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 02/21] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  7:31   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 11:39     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-19 17:15     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-20  8:59   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-21 10:20     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-24 15:32       ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-25  8:45         ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25  9:27           ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-25 11:24             ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 03/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 04/21] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 05/21] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 06/21] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  7:41   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04  9:07     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 07/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: activate CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 08/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 09/21] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 10/21] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 11/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 12/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: query-cpu-polarization qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 13/21] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 17:00   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-03 17:21     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 14/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  9:21   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 12:17     ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-25 15:03     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:28 ` [PATCH v19 15/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarisation Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  9:22   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 12:26     ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 16/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 17/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU Pierre Morel
2023-04-04  9:19   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 12:02     ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 18/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 19/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology dedicated errors Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 20/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move Pierre Morel
2023-04-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v19 21/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology query-cpu-polarization Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2b3c224e-cfa2-df8f-443c-d49ced4ae29b@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).