From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56095) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elxcu-0000xG-9d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:01:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elxc1-0006wN-0Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:01:36 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:43360 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elxc0-0006s0-O8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:00:40 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1EDxbfc056726 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:00:37 -0500 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2g4nw69xbg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:00:36 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:00:34 -0000 References: <1518542328-25741-1-git-send-email-mihajlov@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180214115725.34ba0008.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Viktor Mihajlovski Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:00:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180214115725.34ba0008.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2b5ab665-97eb-1d33-ada5-63b57fa1f855@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] add query-cpu-fast and related s390 changes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, ehabkost@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, eblake@redhat.com On 14.02.2018 11:57, Cornelia Huck wrote: [...] > > How shall we proceed with this series? Patch 3 depends upon patch 1, so > I think it makes sense to merge this in one go. > > I can give my R-b on patch 1 and Someone(tm) can merge this, or I can > take the whole series through the s390 tree (with some further > reviews/acks on patches 2/3). > Let's wait for the outstanding reviews (QAPI/HMP). If no major concerns are voiced, the series could go in via the s390 tree. As David H. pointed out, I've missed his r-b on patch 1, so you could add that along with Christian's if no v3 is required. -- Regards, Viktor Mihajlovski