From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com,
mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on provided length
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:16:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b7a8807-279f-1256-e89b-0f53ae6d5623@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <811e906a-689e-a53c-706e-5d6217ef3cb2@linux.ibm.com>
On 9/10/20 1:56 PM, Collin Walling wrote:
> On 9/10/20 1:50 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 10/09/2020 11.36, Collin Walling wrote:
>>> The header contained within the SCCB passed to the SCLP service call
>>> contains the actual length of the SCCB. Instead of allocating a static
>>> 4K size for the work sccb, let's allow for a variable size determined
>>> by the value in the header. The proper checks are already in place to
>>> ensure the SCCB length is sufficent to store a full response and that
>>> the length does not cross any explicitly-set boundaries.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/s390x/event-facility.c | 2 +-
>>> hw/s390x/sclp.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>> include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
>>> index 645b4080c5..ed92ce510d 100644
>>> --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
>>> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static uint16_t handle_sccb_read_events(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB *sccb,
>>>
>>> event_buf = &red->ebh;
>>> event_buf->length = 0;
>>> - slen = sizeof(sccb->data);
>>> + slen = sccb_data_len(sccb);
>>>
>>> rc = SCLP_RC_NO_EVENT_BUFFERS_STORED;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>>> index 69a8724dc7..cb8e2e8ec3 100644
>>> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>>> @@ -231,25 +231,30 @@ int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
>>> {
>>> SCLPDevice *sclp = get_sclp_device();
>>> SCLPDeviceClass *sclp_c = SCLP_GET_CLASS(sclp);
>>> - SCCB work_sccb;
>>> - hwaddr sccb_len = sizeof(SCCB);
>>> + SCCBHeader header;
>>> + SCCB *work_sccb;
>>
>> I'd maybe use "g_autofree SCCB *work_sccb = NULL" so you don't have to
>> worry about doing the g_free() later.
>
> Can do.
>
>>
>>> - s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb, sccb_len);
>>> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, &header, sizeof(SCCBHeader));
>>> +
>>> + work_sccb = g_malloc0(header.length);
>>
>> Please use be16_to_cpu(header.length) here as well.
>
> Good catch, thanks!
>
Shouldn't the mallocs use cpu_to_be16 instead since the header length
was read in from a cpu?
[...]
--
Regards,
Collin
Stay safe and stay healthy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-11 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 9:36 [PATCH v5 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] s390/sclp: get machine once during read scp/cpu info Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks Collin Walling
2020-09-10 17:45 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 10:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-11 14:50 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on provided length Collin Walling
2020-09-10 17:50 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-10 17:56 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-11 18:16 ` Collin Walling [this message]
2020-09-12 6:28 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-15 14:27 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-09-11 4:33 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 10:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-09-11 10:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-11 13:41 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 13:54 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 14:52 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-09-10 11:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-11 15:08 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 15:14 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-15 14:57 ` Collin Walling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b7a8807-279f-1256-e89b-0f53ae6d5623@linux.ibm.com \
--to=walling@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).