* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/pci: add common fmb
@ 2018-09-04 9:15 Yi Min Zhao
[not found] ` <d1694693-0bfc-a8b3-c1b2-afc1c9954eac@linux.ibm.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yi Min Zhao @ 2018-09-04 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: cohuck, thuth, borntraeger, pmorel, zyimin
Common function measurement block is used to report counters of
successfully issued pcilg/stg/stb and rpcit instructions. This patch
introduces a new struct ZpciFmb and schedules a timer callback to
copy fmb to the guest memory at a interval time which is set to
4s by default. While attemping to update fmb failed, an event error
would be generated. After pcilg/stg/stb and rpcit interception
handlers issue successfully, increase the related counter. The guest
could pass null address to switch off FMB and stop corresponding
timer.
Signed-off-by: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel<pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
---
hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 3 +-
hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 24 +++++++++++
hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
index e3e0ebb7f6..7bd0b9d1e5 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
@@ -967,6 +967,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_hot_unplug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
bus = pci_get_bus(pci_dev);
devfn = pci_dev->devfn;
object_unparent(OBJECT(pci_dev));
+ fmb_timer_free(pbdev);
s390_pci_msix_free(pbdev);
s390_pci_iommu_free(s, bus, devfn);
pbdev->pdev = NULL;
@@ -1139,7 +1140,7 @@ static void s390_pci_device_reset(DeviceState *dev)
pci_dereg_ioat(pbdev->iommu);
}
- pbdev->fmb_addr = 0;
+ fmb_timer_free(pbdev);
}
static void s390_pci_get_fid(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
index 1f7f9b5814..fdf13a19c0 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
@@ -286,6 +286,28 @@ typedef struct S390PCIIOMMUTable {
S390PCIIOMMU *iommu[PCI_SLOT_MAX];
} S390PCIIOMMUTable;
+/* Function Measurement Block */
+#define DEFAULT_MUI 4000
+#define UPDATE_U_BIT 0x1ULL
+#define FMBK_MASK 0xfULL
+
+typedef struct ZpciFmbFmt0 {
+ uint64_t dma_rbytes;
+ uint64_t dma_wbytes;
+} ZpciFmbFmt0;
+
+typedef struct ZpciFmb {
+ uint8_t format;
+ uint8_t fmt_ind[3];
+ uint32_t sample;
+ uint64_t last_update;
+ uint64_t ld_ops;
+ uint64_t st_ops;
+ uint64_t stb_ops;
+ uint64_t rpcit_ops;
+ ZpciFmbFmt0 fmt0;
+} QEMU_PACKED __attribute((__aligned__(8))) ZpciFmb;
+
struct S390PCIBusDevice {
DeviceState qdev;
PCIDevice *pdev;
@@ -297,6 +319,8 @@ struct S390PCIBusDevice {
uint32_t fid;
bool fid_defined;
uint64_t fmb_addr;
+ ZpciFmb fmb;
+ QEMUTimer *fmb_timer;
uint8_t isc;
uint16_t noi;
uint16_t maxstbl;
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
index 7b61367ee3..1ed5cb91d0 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include "exec/memory-internal.h"
#include "qemu/error-report.h"
#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/tod.h"
#ifndef DEBUG_S390PCI_INST
#define DEBUG_S390PCI_INST 0
@@ -293,7 +294,7 @@ int clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
resgrp->fr = 1;
stq_p(&resgrp->dasm, 0);
stq_p(&resgrp->msia, ZPCI_MSI_ADDR);
- stw_p(&resgrp->mui, 0);
+ stw_p(&resgrp->mui, DEFAULT_MUI);
stw_p(&resgrp->i, 128);
stw_p(&resgrp->maxstbl, 128);
resgrp->version = 0;
@@ -456,6 +457,10 @@ int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
return 0;
}
+ if (pbdev->fmb_addr) {
+ pbdev->fmb.ld_ops++;
+ }
+
env->regs[r1] = data;
setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_OK);
return 0;
@@ -561,6 +566,10 @@ int pcistg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
return 0;
}
+ if (pbdev->fmb_addr) {
+ pbdev->fmb.st_ops++;
+ }
+
setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_OK);
return 0;
}
@@ -681,6 +690,9 @@ err:
s390_set_status_code(env, r1, ZPCI_PCI_ST_FUNC_IN_ERR);
s390_pci_generate_error_event(error, pbdev->fh, pbdev->fid, start, 0);
} else {
+ if (pbdev->fmb_addr) {
+ pbdev->fmb.rpcit_ops++;
+ }
setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_OK);
}
return 0;
@@ -783,6 +795,10 @@ int pcistb_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r3, uint64_t gaddr,
}
}
+ if (pbdev->fmb_addr) {
+ pbdev->fmb.stb_ops++;
+ }
+
setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_OK);
return 0;
@@ -889,6 +905,63 @@ void pci_dereg_ioat(S390PCIIOMMU *iommu)
iommu->g_iota = 0;
}
+void fmb_timer_free(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
+{
+ if (pbdev->fmb_timer) {
+ timer_del(pbdev->fmb_timer);
+ timer_free(pbdev->fmb_timer);
+ pbdev->fmb_timer = NULL;
+ }
+ pbdev->fmb_addr = 0;
+ memset(&pbdev->fmb, 0, sizeof(ZpciFmb));
+}
+
+static int fmb_do_update(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, uint8_t offset, int len)
+{
+ MemTxResult ret;
+
+ ret = address_space_write(&address_space_memory,
+ pbdev->fmb_addr + (uint64_t)offset,
+ MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
+ (uint8_t *)&pbdev->fmb + offset,
+ len);
+ if (ret) {
+ s390_pci_generate_error_event(ERR_EVENT_FMBA, pbdev->fh, pbdev->fid,
+ pbdev->fmb_addr, 0);
+ fmb_timer_free(pbdev);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void fmb_update(void *opaque)
+{
+ S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev = opaque;
+ int64_t t = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL);
+ uint8_t offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, last_update);
+
+ /* Update U bit */
+ pbdev->fmb.last_update |= UPDATE_U_BIT;
+ if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, offset, sizeof(uint64_t))) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Update FMB counters */
+ pbdev->fmb.sample++;
+ if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, 0, sizeof(ZpciFmb))) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Clear U bit and update the time */
+ pbdev->fmb.last_update = time2tod(qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL));
+ pbdev->fmb.last_update &= ~UPDATE_U_BIT;
+ if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, offset, sizeof(uint64_t))) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ timer_mod(pbdev->fmb_timer, t + DEFAULT_MUI);
+}
+
int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar,
uintptr_t ra)
{
@@ -1018,9 +1091,35 @@ int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar,
s390_set_status_code(env, r1, ZPCI_MOD_ST_SEQUENCE);
}
break;
- case ZPCI_MOD_FC_SET_MEASURE:
- pbdev->fmb_addr = ldq_p(&fib.fmb_addr);
+ case ZPCI_MOD_FC_SET_MEASURE: {
+ uint64_t fmb_addr = ldq_p(&fib.fmb_addr);
+
+ if (fmb_addr & FMBK_MASK) {
+ cc = ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR;
+ s390_pci_generate_error_event(ERR_EVENT_FMBPRO, pbdev->fh,
+ pbdev->fid, fmb_addr, 0);
+ fmb_timer_free(pbdev);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (!fmb_addr) {
+ /* Stop updating FMB. */
+ fmb_timer_free(pbdev);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ pbdev->fmb_addr = fmb_addr;
+ if (!pbdev->fmb_timer) {
+ pbdev->fmb_timer = timer_new_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL,
+ fmb_update, pbdev);
+ } else if (timer_pending(pbdev->fmb_timer)) {
+ /* Remove pending timer to update FMB address. */
+ timer_del(pbdev->fmb_timer);
+ }
+ timer_mod(pbdev->fmb_timer,
+ qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) + DEFAULT_MUI);
break;
+ }
default:
s390_program_interrupt(&cpu->env, PGM_OPERAND, 6, ra);
cc = ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR;
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
index 91c3d61f2a..fa3bf8b5aa 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar,
uintptr_t ra);
int stpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar,
uintptr_t ra);
+void fmb_timer_free(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev);
#define ZPCI_IO_BAR_MIN 0
#define ZPCI_IO_BAR_MAX 5
--
Yi Min
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x/pci: add common fmb
[not found] ` <809560dd-3fff-3cec-5b65-cb7e5cd32383@linux.ibm.com>
@ 2018-10-01 9:22 ` Thomas Huth
2018-10-16 7:19 ` Yi Min Zhao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2018-10-01 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yi Min Zhao, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, Cornelia Huck
On 2018-09-29 07:48, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
>
> 在 2018/9/19 下午3:53, Thomas Huth 写道:
>> On 2018-09-19 09:08, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
[...]
>>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
>>>> index 1f7f9b5814..fdf13a19c0 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
>>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
>>>> @@ -286,6 +286,28 @@ typedef struct S390PCIIOMMUTable {
>>>> S390PCIIOMMU *iommu[PCI_SLOT_MAX];
>>>> } S390PCIIOMMUTable;
>>>> +/* Function Measurement Block */
>>>> +#define DEFAULT_MUI 4000
>>>> +#define UPDATE_U_BIT 0x1ULL
>>>> +#define FMBK_MASK 0xfULL
>>>> +
>>>> +typedef struct ZpciFmbFmt0 {
>>>> + uint64_t dma_rbytes;
>>>> + uint64_t dma_wbytes;
>>>> +} ZpciFmbFmt0;
>>>> +
>>>> +typedef struct ZpciFmb {
>>>> + uint8_t format;
>>>> + uint8_t fmt_ind[3];
>>>> + uint32_t sample;
>>>> + uint64_t last_update;
>>>> + uint64_t ld_ops;
>>>> + uint64_t st_ops;
>>>> + uint64_t stb_ops;
>>>> + uint64_t rpcit_ops;
>>>> + ZpciFmbFmt0 fmt0;
>>>> +} QEMU_PACKED __attribute((__aligned__(8))) ZpciFmb;
>> All the fields in this struct are naturally aligned already, so I'd
>> maybe rather drop the QEMU_PACKED and add a
>> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(sizeof(ZpciFmb) != xx, ...) statement afterwards.
> Currently we only implement FMT0. There're other FMTs to be implemented
> in future.
> So here there would be a union and we can't give a specific size to
> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG.
> Can we use the max size for checking?
I think you could use this to check the beginning of the struct:
QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(offsetof(ZpciFmb, fmt0) != 48, "padding in ZpciFmb");
>>>> struct S390PCIBusDevice {
>>>> DeviceState qdev;
>>>> PCIDevice *pdev;
>>>> @@ -297,6 +319,8 @@ struct S390PCIBusDevice {
>>>> uint32_t fid;
>>>> bool fid_defined;
>>>> uint64_t fmb_addr;
>>>> + ZpciFmb fmb;
>> ... since you embed it here in another struct which does not have any
>> alignment requirements. This is likely going to cause an error with GCC
>> 8.1, we've had this problem in the past already:
>>
>> https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=a6e4385dea94850d7b06b0
> Ah...I didn't test the code with gcc 8+. GCC I used is 7.2.
> It should get the same warining.
Nobody reported the warning in the s390-ccw bios until GCC 8 had been
released, so I assume this is a new warning in GCC 8.
>> Is the __align__(8) required at all? As far as I understand the code,
>> the struct is not living inside the guest memory, is it? So you could
>> simply drop the __align__(8).
>> But if you need it, I think you have to allocate the memory for ZpciFmb
>> separately (and use a "ZpciFmb *fmb" here instead).
> I want to copy the entire structure to the guest memory during updating
> FMB.
> It's not a good idea to do copy for all members multiple times.
Sure, but you're doing the updates through address_space_write(), so as
far as I can see there is currently no need for the
attribute((__aligned__(8))) here (or did I miss something?). Thus I'd
like to suggest to simply remove that attribute here.
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x/pci: add common fmb
2018-10-01 9:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
@ 2018-10-16 7:19 ` Yi Min Zhao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yi Min Zhao @ 2018-10-16 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
在 2018/10/1 下午5:22, Thomas Huth 写道:
> On 2018-09-29 07:48, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
>> 在 2018/9/19 下午3:53, Thomas Huth 写道:
>>> On 2018-09-19 09:08, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
>>>>> index 1f7f9b5814..fdf13a19c0 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
>>>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
>>>>> @@ -286,6 +286,28 @@ typedef struct S390PCIIOMMUTable {
>>>>> S390PCIIOMMU *iommu[PCI_SLOT_MAX];
>>>>> } S390PCIIOMMUTable;
>>>>> +/* Function Measurement Block */
>>>>> +#define DEFAULT_MUI 4000
>>>>> +#define UPDATE_U_BIT 0x1ULL
>>>>> +#define FMBK_MASK 0xfULL
>>>>> +
>>>>> +typedef struct ZpciFmbFmt0 {
>>>>> + uint64_t dma_rbytes;
>>>>> + uint64_t dma_wbytes;
>>>>> +} ZpciFmbFmt0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +typedef struct ZpciFmb {
>>>>> + uint8_t format;
>>>>> + uint8_t fmt_ind[3];
>>>>> + uint32_t sample;
>>>>> + uint64_t last_update;
>>>>> + uint64_t ld_ops;
>>>>> + uint64_t st_ops;
>>>>> + uint64_t stb_ops;
>>>>> + uint64_t rpcit_ops;
>>>>> + ZpciFmbFmt0 fmt0;
>>>>> +} QEMU_PACKED __attribute((__aligned__(8))) ZpciFmb;
>>> All the fields in this struct are naturally aligned already, so I'd
>>> maybe rather drop the QEMU_PACKED and add a
>>> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(sizeof(ZpciFmb) != xx, ...) statement afterwards.
>> Currently we only implement FMT0. There're other FMTs to be implemented
>> in future.
>> So here there would be a union and we can't give a specific size to
>> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG.
>> Can we use the max size for checking?
> I think you could use this to check the beginning of the struct:
At the beginning of the struct? not after it?
>
> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(offsetof(ZpciFmb, fmt0) != 48, "padding in ZpciFmb");
I think this could satisfy our requirement.
>
>>>>> struct S390PCIBusDevice {
>>>>> DeviceState qdev;
>>>>> PCIDevice *pdev;
>>>>> @@ -297,6 +319,8 @@ struct S390PCIBusDevice {
>>>>> uint32_t fid;
>>>>> bool fid_defined;
>>>>> uint64_t fmb_addr;
>>>>> + ZpciFmb fmb;
>>> ... since you embed it here in another struct which does not have any
>>> alignment requirements. This is likely going to cause an error with GCC
>>> 8.1, we've had this problem in the past already:
>>>
>>> https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=a6e4385dea94850d7b06b0
>> Ah...I didn't test the code with gcc 8+. GCC I used is 7.2.
>> It should get the same warining.
> Nobody reported the warning in the s390-ccw bios until GCC 8 had been
> released, so I assume this is a new warning in GCC 8.
>
>>> Is the __align__(8) required at all? As far as I understand the code,
>>> the struct is not living inside the guest memory, is it? So you could
>>> simply drop the __align__(8).
>>> But if you need it, I think you have to allocate the memory for ZpciFmb
>>> separately (and use a "ZpciFmb *fmb" here instead).
>> I want to copy the entire structure to the guest memory during updating
>> FMB.
>> It's not a good idea to do copy for all members multiple times.
> Sure, but you're doing the updates through address_space_write(), so as
> far as I can see there is currently no need for the
> attribute((__aligned__(8))) here (or did I miss something?). Thus I'd
> like to suggest to simply remove that attribute here.
>
> Thomas
>
>
Agree to remove it.
--
Yi Min
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-16 7:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-04 9:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/pci: add common fmb Yi Min Zhao
[not found] ` <d1694693-0bfc-a8b3-c1b2-afc1c9954eac@linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <9f3259d4-5403-18b8-5588-1c51fd1f3da1@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <809560dd-3fff-3cec-5b65-cb7e5cd32383@linux.ibm.com>
2018-10-01 9:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2018-10-16 7:19 ` Yi Min Zhao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).