[Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Markus Armbruster]

Short story: please add

    [am]
            messageid = true

to your .gitconfig.

Long story.  git-am can add a Message-id: tag.  Looks like this:

    commit 335dbb5de1e98c4dc73590349f17bb2a4d72596c
    Author: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
    Date:   Mon Feb 4 09:25:43 2019 +0100
    Commit:     Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
    CommitDate: Mon Feb 4 15:25:21 2019 +0000

        tests/docker/test-mingw and docs: Remove --with-sdlabi=2.0

        Patchew currently reports failures with the mingw docker test - this
        is due to --with-sdlabi=2.0 configure flag which does not exist anymore.
        Remove this remainder from the docker test and the docs now.

        Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
        Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
        Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
        Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
        Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
--->    Message-id: 1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com
        Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail.  It makes finding the review
thread easier and more reliable.  It's also a valid key on Patchew[*].

Sadly, not all of our commits don't carry it.  Here's how top committers
have been doing recently[**]:

   with without
    264      21 Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
     65       2 Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
     64       0 Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
     64       0 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
     62       1 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
     56       0 Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
     29      72 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
     24      24 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
     10      31 Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
      0     107 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
      0     106 David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
      0      93 Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
      0      81 Aleksandar Markovic <amarkovic@wavecomp.com>
      0      69 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
      0      54 Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
      0      50 Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
      0      29 Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
      0      28 Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>

Not bad, but there's room for improvement.


[*] Try https://patchew.org/search?q=id%3A1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth%40redhat.com

[**] git-log master --no-merges --pretty=fuller --since '3 months ago' | gawk '/^Commit: / { if (c) h[c][m]++; c=$0; m=0 } /^    Message-[Ii]d: / { m=1 } END { for (c in h) if (h[c][0] + h[c][1] > 25) printf "%7d %7d %s\n", h[c][1], h[c][0], substr(c,13) }' | sort -nr

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Thomas Huth]

On 2019-02-08 08:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Short story: please add
> 
>     [am]
>             messageid = true
> 
> to your .gitconfig.
> 
> Long story.  git-am can add a Message-id: tag.  Looks like this:
> 
>     commit 335dbb5de1e98c4dc73590349f17bb2a4d72596c
>     Author: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>     Date:   Mon Feb 4 09:25:43 2019 +0100
>     Commit:     Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>     CommitDate: Mon Feb 4 15:25:21 2019 +0000
> 
>         tests/docker/test-mingw and docs: Remove --with-sdlabi=2.0
> 
>         Patchew currently reports failures with the mingw docker test - this
>         is due to --with-sdlabi=2.0 configure flag which does not exist anymore.
>         Remove this remainder from the docker test and the docs now.
> 
>         Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>         Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>         Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>         Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>         Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> --->    Message-id: 1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com
>         Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> 
> The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail.  It makes finding the review
> thread easier and more reliable.  It's also a valid key on Patchew[*].
> 
> Sadly, not all of our commits don't carry it.  Here's how top committers
> have been doing recently[**]:
> 
>    with without
>     264      21 Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>      65       2 Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
>      64       0 Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
>      64       0 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>      62       1 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>      56       0 Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>      29      72 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>      24      24 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>      10      31 Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
>       0     107 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>       0     106 David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>       0      93 Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>       0      81 Aleksandar Markovic <amarkovic@wavecomp.com>
>       0      69 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
>       0      54 Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>       0      50 Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>       0      29 Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
>       0      28 Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> 
> Not bad, but there's room for improvement.

I'd like to, but I can't. I'm still using git 1.8 and the -m parameter
is not supported there yet.

 Thomas

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Gerd Hoffmann]

  Hi,

> >    with without
> >      65       2 Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

Oops.  Two slipped through:(

> I'd like to, but I can't. I'm still using git 1.8 and the -m parameter
> is not supported there yet.

rhel-7 software collection has newer git (2.9) available.

HTH,
  Gerd

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Cornelia Huck]

On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 08:30:11 +0100
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:

> Short story: please add
> 
>     [am]
>             messageid = true
> 
> to your .gitconfig.
> 
> Long story.  git-am can add a Message-id: tag.  Looks like this:
> 
>     commit 335dbb5de1e98c4dc73590349f17bb2a4d72596c
>     Author: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>     Date:   Mon Feb 4 09:25:43 2019 +0100
>     Commit:     Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>     CommitDate: Mon Feb 4 15:25:21 2019 +0000
> 
>         tests/docker/test-mingw and docs: Remove --with-sdlabi=2.0
> 
>         Patchew currently reports failures with the mingw docker test - this
>         is due to --with-sdlabi=2.0 configure flag which does not exist anymore.
>         Remove this remainder from the docker test and the docs now.
> 
>         Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>         Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>         Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>         Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>         Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> --->    Message-id: 1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com  
>         Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> 
> The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail.  It makes finding the review
> thread easier and more reliable.  It's also a valid key on Patchew[*].

I'm using it for anything I git am, but I'm usually not git am'ing my
own patches (I just merge from the branch I have them on). Is the
message id valuable enough to warrant the extra round-trip for patches
that are committed by the authors themselves?

[I can't say I've used it much myself, if at all.]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Gerd Hoffmann]

On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:57:20AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 08:30:11 +0100
> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Short story: please add
> > 
> >     [am]
> >             messageid = true
> > 
> > to your .gitconfig.
> > 
> > Long story.  git-am can add a Message-id: tag.  Looks like this:
> > 
> >     commit 335dbb5de1e98c4dc73590349f17bb2a4d72596c
> >     Author: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> >     Date:   Mon Feb 4 09:25:43 2019 +0100
> >     Commit:     Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> >     CommitDate: Mon Feb 4 15:25:21 2019 +0000
> > 
> >         tests/docker/test-mingw and docs: Remove --with-sdlabi=2.0
> > 
> >         Patchew currently reports failures with the mingw docker test - this
> >         is due to --with-sdlabi=2.0 configure flag which does not exist anymore.
> >         Remove this remainder from the docker test and the docs now.
> > 
> >         Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> >         Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> >         Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> >         Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> >         Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> > --->    Message-id: 1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com  
> >         Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > 
> > The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail.  It makes finding the review
> > thread easier and more reliable.  It's also a valid key on Patchew[*].
> 
> I'm using it for anything I git am, but I'm usually not git am'ing my
> own patches (I just merge from the branch I have them on). Is the
> message id valuable enough to warrant the extra round-trip for patches
> that are committed by the authors themselves?

I typically do that, using Stefan's "patches" tool, to automatically
collect Reviewed-by: lines from replies.  And that adds the message id
too.

cheers,
  Gerd

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 2/8/19 8:30 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Short story: please add
> 
>     [am]
>             messageid = true
> 
> to your .gitconfig.
> 
> Long story.  git-am can add a Message-id: tag.  Looks like this:
> 
>     commit 335dbb5de1e98c4dc73590349f17bb2a4d72596c
>     Author: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>     Date:   Mon Feb 4 09:25:43 2019 +0100
>     Commit:     Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>     CommitDate: Mon Feb 4 15:25:21 2019 +0000
> 
>         tests/docker/test-mingw and docs: Remove --with-sdlabi=2.0
> 
>         Patchew currently reports failures with the mingw docker test - this
>         is due to --with-sdlabi=2.0 configure flag which does not exist anymore.
>         Remove this remainder from the docker test and the docs now.
> 
>         Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>         Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>         Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>         Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>         Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> --->    Message-id: 1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com
>         Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> 
> The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail.  It makes finding the review
> thread easier and more reliable.  It's also a valid key on Patchew[*].

It is sometimes confusing however, see:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-02/msg01992.html

We have:

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190123065618.3520-23-yang.zhong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

This is probably a special case, and eventually a Patchew limitation,
but I first wondered who wrote this patch? Since the Message-Id is from
Yang Zhong, is the Signed-off-by tag incorrect?
Then I went thru the previous version and understood the author is
indeed Paolo, but his patch was first sent by Yang Zhong, then he
applied his own patch sent by Yang.

And yet this isn't a pull request but a simple patch, so the Message-Id
might not be very relevant there.

> 
> Sadly, not all of our commits don't carry it.  Here's how top committers

'committers' -> 'maintainers'?

(Actually committers don't know their patch Message-Id before sending
the patch).

> have been doing recently[**]:
> 
>    with without
>     264      21 Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>      65       2 Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
>      64       0 Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
>      64       0 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>      62       1 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>      56       0 Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>      29      72 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>      24      24 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>      10      31 Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
>       0     107 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>       0     106 David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>       0      93 Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>       0      81 Aleksandar Markovic <amarkovic@wavecomp.com>
>       0      69 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
>       0      54 Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>       0      50 Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>       0      29 Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
>       0      28 Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> 
> Not bad, but there's room for improvement.
> 
> 
> [*] Try https://patchew.org/search?q=id%3A1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth%40redhat.com
> 
> [**] git-log master --no-merges --pretty=fuller --since '3 months ago' | gawk '/^Commit: / { if (c) h[c][m]++; c=$0; m=0 } /^    Message-[Ii]d: / { m=1 } END { for (c in h) if (h[c][0] + h[c][1] > 25) printf "%7d %7d %s\n", h[c][1], h[c][0], substr(c,13) }' | sort -nr
> 

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Markus Armbruster]

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes:

> On 2/8/19 8:30 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Short story: please add
>> 
>>     [am]
>>             messageid = true
>> 
>> to your .gitconfig.
>> 
>> Long story.  git-am can add a Message-id: tag.  Looks like this:
>> 
>>     commit 335dbb5de1e98c4dc73590349f17bb2a4d72596c
>>     Author: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>     Date:   Mon Feb 4 09:25:43 2019 +0100
>>     Commit:     Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>>     CommitDate: Mon Feb 4 15:25:21 2019 +0000
>> 
>>         tests/docker/test-mingw and docs: Remove --with-sdlabi=2.0
>> 
>>         Patchew currently reports failures with the mingw docker test - this
>>         is due to --with-sdlabi=2.0 configure flag which does not exist anymore.
>>         Remove this remainder from the docker test and the docs now.
>> 
>>         Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>         Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>>         Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>         Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>         Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> --->    Message-id: 1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com
>>         Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>> 
>> The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail.  It makes finding the review
>> thread easier and more reliable.  It's also a valid key on Patchew[*].
>
> It is sometimes confusing however, see:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-02/msg01992.html
>
> We have:
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Message-Id: <20190123065618.3520-23-yang.zhong@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> This is probably a special case, and eventually a Patchew limitation,
> but I first wondered who wrote this patch? Since the Message-Id is from
> Yang Zhong, is the Signed-off-by tag incorrect?
> Then I went thru the previous version and understood the author is
> indeed Paolo, but his patch was first sent by Yang Zhong, then he
> applied his own patch sent by Yang.
>
> And yet this isn't a pull request but a simple patch, so the Message-Id
> might not be very relevant there.

git-am appears to add a Message-Id only if none is present.

Ideally, people don't submit patches with Message-Id, and maintainers do
use git-am -m.  Given how losely we enforce our process, we're bound to
deviate from the ideal, just like for other patch submission details.
All I'm asking for is a best effort.

>> Sadly, not all of our commits don't carry it.  Here's how top committers
>
> 'committers' -> 'maintainers'?
>
> (Actually committers don't know their patch Message-Id before sending
> the patch).

I used "committers" in the sense of "whoever git-log shows in the
"Commit:" line.  I agree these are maintainers in our work flow.
Calling them maintainers would've been clearer.

>> have been doing recently[**]:
>> 
>>    with without
>>     264      21 Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>>      65       2 Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
>>      64       0 Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
>>      64       0 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>>      62       1 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>>      56       0 Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>>      29      72 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>>      24      24 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>      10      31 Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
>>       0     107 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>>       0     106 David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>>       0      93 Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>       0      81 Aleksandar Markovic <amarkovic@wavecomp.com>
>>       0      69 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
>>       0      54 Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>       0      50 Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>       0      29 Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
>>       0      28 Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
>> 
>> Not bad, but there's room for improvement.
>> 
>> 
>> [*] Try https://patchew.org/search?q=id%3A1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth%40redhat.com
>> 
>> [**] git-log master --no-merges --pretty=fuller --since '3 months ago' | gawk '/^Commit: / { if (c) h[c][m]++; c=$0; m=0 } /^    Message-[Ii]d: / { m=1 } END { for (c in h) if (h[c][0] + h[c][1] > 25) printf "%7d %7d %s\n", h[c][1], h[c][0], substr(c,13) }' | sort -nr
>> 

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 08/02/19 17:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> And yet this isn't a pull request but a simple patch, so the Message-Id
> might not be very relevant there.

Yes, I agree that Message-Id is not that relevant if you're taking a
patch from someone else and then reposting it.  But it's a relatively
rare case when >1 people are collaborating on revisions of a series.

Paolo

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Eric Blake]

On 2/8/19 1:30 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Short story: please add
> 
>     [am]
>             messageid = true
> 
> to your .gitconfig.
> 
> Long story.  git-am can add a Message-id: tag.  Looks like this:
> 

> 
>         Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>         Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>         Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>         Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>         Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> --->    Message-id: 1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com
>         Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> 
> The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail.  It makes finding the review
> thread easier and more reliable.  It's also a valid key on Patchew[*].

I find the tag valuable enough in later git searches that I don't mind
feeding my own patches back through the mailing list to add it (patchew
helps with that, of course).  But for it to become mandatory, we'd need
to enhance scripts/checkpatch.pl to enforce it.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Markus Armbruster]

Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:

> On 2/8/19 1:30 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Short story: please add
>> 
>>     [am]
>>             messageid = true
>> 
>> to your .gitconfig.
>> 
>> Long story.  git-am can add a Message-id: tag.  Looks like this:
>> 
>
>> 
>>         Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>         Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>>         Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>         Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>         Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> --->    Message-id: 1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com
>>         Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>> 
>> The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail.  It makes finding the review
>> thread easier and more reliable.  It's also a valid key on Patchew[*].
>
> I find the tag valuable enough in later git searches that I don't mind
> feeding my own patches back through the mailing list to add it (patchew
> helps with that, of course).  But for it to become mandatory, we'd need
> to enhance scripts/checkpatch.pl to enforce it.

I'm afraid checkpatch is the wrong place.  When you submit v1 patches
for review, there is no Message-id.  Even for respins, we don't want
one.  It should be added when patches get applied for real, so the
commit carries exactly one Message-id, and it refers back to the final
version on the list.

Two ideas:

* Have Patchew flag pull requests lacking Message-id

* Admittedly vague: some kind of git pre merge hook magic to make
  git-merge flag missing Message-id

Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m

[Eric Blake]

On 2/26/19 1:15 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:

>>> The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail.  It makes finding the review
>>> thread easier and more reliable.  It's also a valid key on Patchew[*].
>>
>> I find the tag valuable enough in later git searches that I don't mind
>> feeding my own patches back through the mailing list to add it (patchew
>> helps with that, of course).  But for it to become mandatory, we'd need
>> to enhance scripts/checkpatch.pl to enforce it.
> 
> I'm afraid checkpatch is the wrong place.  When you submit v1 patches
> for review, there is no Message-id.  Even for respins, we don't want
> one.  It should be added when patches get applied for real, so the
> commit carries exactly one Message-id, and it refers back to the final
> version on the list.

Indeed, I wasn't thinking about how it would work. checkpatch.pl can
filter for 'PULL' being in a subject line, as that will not affect
normal submissions, but there is no guarantee that it will mesh with the
workflows of the various maintainers.

> 
> Two ideas:
> 
> * Have Patchew flag pull requests lacking Message-id

Yes, that works, as well as patching Peter's sanity-checking script to
do likewise.

> 
> * Admittedly vague: some kind of git pre merge hook magic to make
>   git-merge flag missing Message-id

I'm not sure if Peter has his sanity-checker script plugged in via git
hooks or some other way.

 https://git.linaro.org/people/peter.maydell/misc-scripts.git/

if someone wants to propose a patch to it.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org