From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] chardev/char-pty: Avoid losing bytes when the other side just (re-)connected
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 14:00:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bb2f8ac-43b4-9505-c163-d29964bf6a30@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZN33W+LhAn2FrFDT@redhat.com>
On 17/08/2023 12.32, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:07:43PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> When starting a guest via libvirt with "virsh start --console ...",
>> the first second of the console output is missing. This is especially
>> annoying on s390x that only has a text console by default and no graphical
>> output - if the bios fails to boot here, the information about what went
>> wrong is completely lost.
>>
>> One part of the problem (there is also some things to be done on the
>> libvirt side) is that QEMU only checks with a 1 second timer whether
>> the other side of the pty is already connected, so the first second of
>> the console output is always lost.
>>
>> This likely used to work better in the past, since the code once checked
>> for a re-connection during write, but this has been removed in commit
>> f8278c7d74 ("char-pty: remove the check for connection on write") to avoid
>> some locking.
>>
>> To ease the situation here at least a little bit, let's check with g_poll()
>> whether we could send out the data anyway, even if the connection has not
>> been marked as "connected" yet. The file descriptor is marked as non-blocking
>> anyway since commit fac6688a18 ("Do not hang on full PTY"), so this should
>> not cause any trouble if the other side is not ready for receiving yet.
>>
>> With this patch applied, I can now successfully see the bios output of
>> a s390x guest when running it with "virsh start --console" (with a patched
>> version of virsh that fixes the remaining issues there, too).
>>
>> Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> chardev/char-pty.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/chardev/char-pty.c b/chardev/char-pty.c
>> index 4e5deac18a..fad12dfef3 100644
>> --- a/chardev/char-pty.c
>> +++ b/chardev/char-pty.c
>> @@ -106,11 +106,27 @@ static void pty_chr_update_read_handler(Chardev *chr)
>> static int char_pty_chr_write(Chardev *chr, const uint8_t *buf, int len)
>> {
>> PtyChardev *s = PTY_CHARDEV(chr);
>> + GPollFD pfd;
>> + int rc;
>>
>> - if (!s->connected) {
>> - return len;
>> + if (s->connected) {
>> + return io_channel_send(s->ioc, buf, len);
>> }
>> - return io_channel_send(s->ioc, buf, len);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The other side might already be re-connected, but the timer might
>> + * not have fired yet. So let's check here whether we can write again:
>> + */
>> + pfd.fd = QIO_CHANNEL_FILE(s->ioc)->fd;
>> + pfd.events = G_IO_OUT;
>> + pfd.revents = 0;
>> + rc = RETRY_ON_EINTR(g_poll(&pfd, 1, 0));
>> + g_assert(rc >= 0);
>> + if (!(pfd.revents & G_IO_HUP) && (pfd.revents & G_IO_OUT)) {
>
> Should (can?) we call
>
> pty_chr_state(chr, 1);
>
> here ?
As far as I understood commit f8278c7d74c6 and f7ea2038bea04628, this is not
possible anymore since the lock has been removed.
>> + io_channel_send(s->ioc, buf, len);
>
> As it feels a little dirty to be sending data before setting the
> 'connected == 1' and thus issuing the 'CHR_EVENT_OPENED' event
I didn't find a really better solution so far. We could maybe introduce a
buffer in the char-pty code and store the last second of guest output, but
IMHO that's way more complex and thus somewhat ugly, too?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-17 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 21:07 [PATCH] chardev/char-pty: Avoid losing bytes when the other side just (re-)connected Thomas Huth
2023-08-17 10:32 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-17 12:00 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-08-17 13:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-17 13:47 ` Marc-André Lureau
2023-08-17 17:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-08-28 12:23 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-28 5:18 ` Thomas Huth
2023-08-23 9:44 ` Amaury Pouly
2023-09-28 11:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-03-12 12:18 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-03-12 12:29 ` Thomas Huth
2025-03-12 14:17 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2bb2f8ac-43b4-9505-c163-d29964bf6a30@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).