From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
Wen Congyang <wencongyang2@huawei.com>,
Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/15] jobs: remove aiocontext locks since the functions are under BQL
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 16:56:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bc317aa-098e-67c6-013d-e661d292d1d1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a19af72b-3b81-7181-15ed-2bbaa50779fd@virtuozzo.com>
On 02/11/2021 13:41, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hmm. subject looks like it's safe to remove aiocontext locks from any
> qmp command?
>
> For example, commit 91005a495e228eb added aiocontext locks back to qmp
> bitmap add/remove commands because otherwise they crashed.
>
> So, I'm not sure that being under BQL is enough to drop aiocontext
> locking..
>
>
In this specific case the aiocontext is useless there. I am not sure
what it was used for before, but if you look at what it protects in this
patch we have:
- block_job_query: not called by anyone else, and internally calls:
* block_job_is_internal = checks struct job id, that is only written at
job initialization
* progress_get_snapshot = we made it thread safe, as you might remember
* accesses struct job fields, that we protect anyways with job_mutex.
Anyways the aiocontext is not used to protect jobs fields.
- job_query_single: same as block_job_query, calls progress_get_snapshot
and accesses job fields.
So yes, I am positive that here removing the aiocontext lock does not
break anything.
Thank you,
Emanuele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-03 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-29 16:38 [RFC PATCH 00/15] job: replace AioContext lock with job_mutex Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] jobs: add job-common.h Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-02 10:07 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] job.c: make job_lock/unlock public Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-02 10:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] job-common.h: categorize fields in struct Job Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-02 10:19 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] jobs: add job-monitor.h Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] job-monitor.h: define the job monitor API Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] jobs: add job-driver.h Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] job-driver.h: add helper functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-02 10:54 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] job.c: minor adjustments in preparation to job-driver Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-02 10:51 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] job.c: move inner aiocontext lock in callbacks Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] aio-wait.h: introduce AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] jobs: remove aiocontext locks since the functions are under BQL Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-02 12:41 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-11-03 15:56 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] jobs: protect jobs with job_lock/unlock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-02 12:53 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] jobs: use job locks and helpers also in the unit tests Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] jobs: add missing job locks to replace aiocontext lock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] jobs: remove all unnecessary AioContext locks Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-02 10:06 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] job: replace AioContext lock with job_mutex Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-02 13:08 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-11-02 14:13 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-02 14:58 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2bc317aa-098e-67c6-013d-e661d292d1d1@redhat.com \
--to=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=wencongyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=xiechanglong.d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).