From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm: prepare for memory devices and sparse memory layouts
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:59:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bca571b-4af9-4ee5-9fdd-15983e2f56d1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241008105455.2302628-9-david@redhat.com>
On 08/10/2024 12.54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> With memory devices, we will have storage attributes for memory that
> exceeds the initial ram size. Further, we can easily have memory holes,
> for which there (currently) are no storage attributes.
>
> In particular, with memory holes, KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS will fail to set
> some storage attributes.
>
> So let's do it like we handle storage keys migration, relying on
> guest_phys_blocks_append(). However, in contrast to storage key
> migration, we will handle it on the migration destination.
>
> This is a preparation for virtio-mem support. Note that ever since the
> "early migration" feature was added (x-early-migration), the state
> of device blocks (plugged/unplugged) is migrated early such that
> guest_phys_blocks_append() will properly consider all currently plugged
> memory blocks and skip any unplugged ones.
>
> In the future, we should try getting rid of the large temporary buffer
> and also not send any attributes for any memory holes, just so they
> get ignored on the destination.
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-07 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-08 10:54 [PATCH v2 00/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: don't crash on weird RAM sizes David Hildenbrand
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: remove hypercall registration mechanism David Hildenbrand
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: prepare for more diag500 hypercalls David Hildenbrand
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] s390x: rename s390-virtio-hcall* to s390-hypercall* David Hildenbrand
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: move setting the maximum guest size from sclp to machine code David Hildenbrand
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_memory_limit() David Hildenbrand
2024-11-06 17:08 ` Thomas Huth
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] s390x/s390-hypercall: introduce DIAG500 STORAGE_LIMIT David Hildenbrand
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm: prepare for memory devices and sparse memory layouts David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 13:59 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] s390x/s390-skeys: prepare for memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-12-13 12:36 ` Thomas Huth
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: " David Hildenbrand
2024-12-13 12:40 ` Thomas Huth
2024-12-13 14:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-13 15:35 ` Thomas Huth
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] s390x/pv: " David Hildenbrand
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] s390x: remember the maximum page size David Hildenbrand
2024-12-13 12:43 ` Thomas Huth
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] s390x/virtio-ccw: add support for virtio based memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-10-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand
2024-10-10 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] " Mario Casquero
2024-11-13 14:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-12 21:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-13 12:35 ` Thomas Huth
2024-12-13 14:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-16 21:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-18 16:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-12-19 14:49 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2bca571b-4af9-4ee5-9fdd-15983e2f56d1@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).