qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Cc: "mreitz@redhat.com" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	"kwolf@redhat.com" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"fam@euphon.net" <fam@euphon.net>,
	"stefanha@redhat.com" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"eblake@redhat.com" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	Denis Lunev <den@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 09:58:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bd2faa2-adeb-924f-656b-bdce6cd5d164@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408162617.258535-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

ping

08.04.2019 19:26, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> It's a continuation for
> "[PATCH] qcow2: avoid lseek on block_status if possible"
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg06598.html
> 
> performance results for block-status on tmpfs [tests originally by Kevin,
> now they are in 01]:
> 
> ./tests/perf/block/qcow2/convert-blockstatus /ramdisk/x
> 
> after 01:
> 
> plain: 81.77
> forward: 82.61
> prealloc: 0.01
> 
> after 02:
> 
> plain: 0.12
> forward: 0.12
> prealloc: 0.01
> 
> v2:
>   01: new
>   02: [mostly by Kevin's comments]
>       - rewritten to go through new flag BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE
>       - never retry detection if failed for first time
>       - rewrite detection to do less iterations and to be more simple
> 
>       iotests 102 behavior changed [and not sure about other two ones
>       in comparison with v1, but it seems it doesn't matter]
> 
>       also, patch subject changed, as now it's a generic change for
>       block layer
> 
> 
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
>    tests/perf: Test lseek influence on qcow2 block-status
>    block: avoid recursive block_status call if possible
> 
>   block/qcow2.h                              |  4 ++
>   include/block/block.h                      |  8 ++-
>   block/io.c                                 |  9 ++-
>   block/qcow2-refcount.c                     | 32 ++++++++++
>   block/qcow2.c                              | 11 ++++
>   tests/perf/block/qcow2/convert-blockstatus | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   tests/qemu-iotests/102                     |  2 +-
>   tests/qemu-iotests/102.out                 |  3 +-
>   tests/qemu-iotests/141.out                 |  2 +-
>   tests/qemu-iotests/144.out                 |  2 +-
>   10 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100755 tests/perf/block/qcow2/convert-blockstatus
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Cc: "kwolf@redhat.com" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"fam@euphon.net" <fam@euphon.net>,
	Denis Lunev <den@virtuozzo.com>,
	"mreitz@redhat.com" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	"stefanha@redhat.com" <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 09:58:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bd2faa2-adeb-924f-656b-bdce6cd5d164@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190422095838.0d8JP6OmaQ_2Ka1gmjqfTxqBaTJDj9-WR_CU8p8EZPU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408162617.258535-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

ping

08.04.2019 19:26, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> It's a continuation for
> "[PATCH] qcow2: avoid lseek on block_status if possible"
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg06598.html
> 
> performance results for block-status on tmpfs [tests originally by Kevin,
> now they are in 01]:
> 
> ./tests/perf/block/qcow2/convert-blockstatus /ramdisk/x
> 
> after 01:
> 
> plain: 81.77
> forward: 82.61
> prealloc: 0.01
> 
> after 02:
> 
> plain: 0.12
> forward: 0.12
> prealloc: 0.01
> 
> v2:
>   01: new
>   02: [mostly by Kevin's comments]
>       - rewritten to go through new flag BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE
>       - never retry detection if failed for first time
>       - rewrite detection to do less iterations and to be more simple
> 
>       iotests 102 behavior changed [and not sure about other two ones
>       in comparison with v1, but it seems it doesn't matter]
> 
>       also, patch subject changed, as now it's a generic change for
>       block layer
> 
> 
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
>    tests/perf: Test lseek influence on qcow2 block-status
>    block: avoid recursive block_status call if possible
> 
>   block/qcow2.h                              |  4 ++
>   include/block/block.h                      |  8 ++-
>   block/io.c                                 |  9 ++-
>   block/qcow2-refcount.c                     | 32 ++++++++++
>   block/qcow2.c                              | 11 ++++
>   tests/perf/block/qcow2/convert-blockstatus | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   tests/qemu-iotests/102                     |  2 +-
>   tests/qemu-iotests/102.out                 |  3 +-
>   tests/qemu-iotests/141.out                 |  2 +-
>   tests/qemu-iotests/144.out                 |  2 +-
>   10 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100755 tests/perf/block/qcow2/convert-blockstatus
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-22  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-08 16:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] tests/perf: Test lseek influence on qcow2 block-status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] block: avoid recursive block_status call if possible Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-22 10:32   ` Kevin Wolf
2019-05-27 15:13   ` Max Reitz
2019-05-28  6:39     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-28 15:47       ` Max Reitz
2019-04-22  9:58 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2019-04-22  9:58   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-06 15:14 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-21  7:50 ` [Qemu-devel] ping " Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-22 10:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2019-05-22 11:30   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2bd2faa2-adeb-924f-656b-bdce6cd5d164@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).