qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, clg@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
	jasowang@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, ddutile@redhat.com,
	jgg@nvidia.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
	clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	yi.l.liu@intel.com, chao.p.peng@intel.com,
	Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/21] intel_iommu: Handle PASID entry removal and update
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 16:25:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c150f38-6404-4b1b-912b-8f39658081f1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250822064101.123526-12-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>

Hi Zhenzhong,

On 8/22/25 8:40 AM, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> This adds an new entry VTDPASIDCacheEntry in VTDAddressSpace to cache the
> pasid entry and track PASID usage and future PASID tagged DMA address
> translation support in vIOMMU.
>
> VTDAddressSpace of PCI_NO_PASID is allocated when device is plugged and
> never freed. For other pasid, VTDAddressSpace instance is created/destroyed
> per the guest pasid entry set up/destroy.
>
> When guest removes or updates a PASID entry, QEMU will capture the guest pasid
> selective pasid cache invalidation, removes VTDAddressSpace or update cached
> PASID entry.
>
> vIOMMU emulator could figure out the reason by fetching latest guest pasid entry
> and compare it with cached PASID entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
> ---
>  hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h |  27 ++++-
>  include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h  |   6 +
>  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  hw/i386/trace-events           |   3 +
>  4 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> index f7510861d1..b9b76dd996 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> @@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ typedef enum VTDFaultReason {
>                                    * request while disabled */
>      VTD_FR_IR_SID_ERR = 0x26,   /* Invalid Source-ID */
>  
> +    VTD_FR_RTADDR_INV_TTM = 0x31,  /* Invalid TTM in RTADDR */
>      /* PASID directory entry access failure */
>      VTD_FR_PASID_DIR_ACCESS_ERR = 0x50,
>      /* The Present(P) field of pasid directory entry is 0 */
> @@ -493,6 +494,15 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
>  #define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL0     0xfff000000000f1c0ULL
>  #define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL1     0xf80ULL
>  
> +/* PASID-cache Invalidate Descriptor (pc_inv_dsc) fields */
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G(x)        extract64((x)->val[0], 4, 2)
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G_DSI       0
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G_PASID_SI  1
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G_GLOBAL    3
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_DID(x)      extract64((x)->val[0], 16, 16)
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_PASID(x)    extract64((x)->val[0], 32, 20)
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_RSVD_VAL0   0xfff000000000f1c0ULL
> +
>  /* Information about page-selective IOTLB invalidate */
>  struct VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo {
>      uint16_t domain_id;
> @@ -553,6 +563,21 @@ typedef struct VTDRootEntry VTDRootEntry;
>  #define VTD_SM_CONTEXT_ENTRY_RSVD_VAL0(aw)  (0x1e0ULL | ~VTD_HAW_MASK(aw))
>  #define VTD_SM_CONTEXT_ENTRY_RSVD_VAL1      0xffffffffffe00000ULL
>  
> +typedef enum VTDPCInvType {
> +    /* VTD spec defined PASID cache invalidation type */
> +    VTD_PASID_CACHE_DOMSI = VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G_DSI,
> +    VTD_PASID_CACHE_PASIDSI = VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G_PASID_SI,
> +    VTD_PASID_CACHE_GLOBAL_INV = VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G_GLOBAL,
> +} VTDPCInvType;
> +
> +typedef struct VTDPASIDCacheInfo {
> +    VTDPCInvType type;
> +    uint16_t did;
> +    uint32_t pasid;
> +    PCIBus *bus;
> +    uint16_t devfn;
> +} VTDPASIDCacheInfo;
> +
>  /* PASID Table Related Definitions */
>  #define VTD_PASID_DIR_BASE_ADDR_MASK  (~0xfffULL)
>  #define VTD_PASID_TABLE_BASE_ADDR_MASK (~0xfffULL)
> @@ -574,7 +599,7 @@ typedef struct VTDRootEntry VTDRootEntry;
>  #define VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_PT          (4ULL << 6)
>  
>  #define VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_AW          7ULL /* Adjusted guest-address-width */
> -#define VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_DID(val)    ((val) & VTD_DOMAIN_ID_MASK)
> +#define VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_DID(x)      extract64((x)->val[1], 0, 16)
>  
>  #define VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_FLPM          3ULL
>  #define VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_FLPTPTR       (~0xfffULL)
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> index 50f9b27a45..0e3826f6f0 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,11 @@ struct VTDPASIDEntry {
>      uint64_t val[8];
>  };
>  
> +typedef struct VTDPASIDCacheEntry {
> +    struct VTDPASIDEntry pasid_entry;
> +    bool valid;
> +} VTDPASIDCacheEntry;
> +
>  struct VTDAddressSpace {
>      PCIBus *bus;
>      uint8_t devfn;
> @@ -107,6 +112,7 @@ struct VTDAddressSpace {
>      MemoryRegion iommu_ir_fault; /* Interrupt region for catching fault */
>      IntelIOMMUState *iommu_state;
>      VTDContextCacheEntry context_cache_entry;
> +    VTDPASIDCacheEntry pasid_cache_entry;
>      QLIST_ENTRY(VTDAddressSpace) next;
>      /* Superset of notifier flags that this address space has */
>      IOMMUNotifierFlag notifier_flags;
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index 1801f1cdf6..a2ee6d684e 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ static uint16_t vtd_get_domain_id(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>  
>      if (s->root_scalable) {
>          vtd_ce_get_pasid_entry(s, ce, &pe, pasid);
> -        return VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_DID(pe.val[1]);
> +        return VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_DID(&pe);
>      }
>  
>      return VTD_CONTEXT_ENTRY_DID(ce->hi);
> @@ -3112,6 +3112,183 @@ static bool vtd_process_piotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>      return true;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int vtd_dev_get_pe_from_pasid(VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as,
> +                                            uint32_t pasid, VTDPASIDEntry *pe)
> +{
> +    IntelIOMMUState *s = vtd_as->iommu_state;
> +    VTDContextEntry ce;
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    if (!s->root_scalable) {
> +        return -VTD_FR_RTADDR_INV_TTM;
> +    }
> +
> +    ret = vtd_dev_to_context_entry(s, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus), vtd_as->devfn,
> +                                   &ce);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    return vtd_ce_get_pasid_entry(s, &ce, pe, pasid);
> +}
> +
> +static bool vtd_pasid_entry_compare(VTDPASIDEntry *p1, VTDPASIDEntry *p2)
> +{
> +    return !memcmp(p1, p2, sizeof(*p1));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function is a loop function which return value determines if
whose returned value determines whether current vtd_as iterator matches
the pasid cache entry info passed in user_data and needs to be removed
from the pasid cache. 
> + * vtd_as including cached pasid entry is removed.
> + *
> + * For PCI_NO_PASID, when corresponding cached pasid entry is cleared,
> + * it returns false so that vtd_as is reserved as it's owned by PCI
> + * sub-system. For other pasid, it returns true so vtd_as is removed.
> + */
> +static gboolean vtd_flush_pasid_locked(gpointer key, gpointer value,
> +                                       gpointer user_data)
> +{
> +    VTDPASIDCacheInfo *pc_info = user_data;
> +    VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as = value;
> +    VTDPASIDCacheEntry *pc_entry = &vtd_as->pasid_cache_entry;
> +    VTDPASIDEntry pe;
> +    uint16_t did;
> +    uint32_t pasid;
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    if (!pc_entry->valid) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    did = VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_DID(&pc_entry->pasid_entry);
> +
> +    if (vtd_as_to_iommu_pasid_locked(vtd_as, &pasid)) {
> +        goto remove;
> +    }
> +
> +    switch (pc_info->type) {
> +    case VTD_PASID_CACHE_PASIDSI:
> +        if (pc_info->pasid != pasid) {
> +            return false;
> +        }
> +        /* fall through */
> +    case VTD_PASID_CACHE_DOMSI:
> +        if (pc_info->did != did) {
> +            return false;
> +        }
> +        /* fall through */
> +    case VTD_PASID_CACHE_GLOBAL_INV:
> +        break;
> +    default:
> +        error_setg(&error_fatal, "invalid pc_info->type for flush");
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * pasid cache invalidation may indicate a present pasid entry to present
> +     * pasid entry modification. To cover such case, vIOMMU emulator needs to
> +     * fetch latest guest pasid entry and compares with cached pasid entry,
> +     * then update pasid cache.
> +     */
> +    ret = vtd_dev_get_pe_from_pasid(vtd_as, pasid, &pe);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        /*
> +         * No valid pasid entry in guest memory. e.g. pasid entry was modified
> +         * to be either all-zero or non-present. Either case means existing
> +         * pasid cache should be removed.
> +         */
> +        goto remove;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Update cached pasid entry if it's stale compared to what's in guest
> +     * memory.
> +     */
> +    if (!vtd_pasid_entry_compare(&pe, &pc_entry->pasid_entry)) {
> +        pc_entry->pasid_entry = pe;
> +    }
> +    return false;
> +
> +remove:
> +    pc_entry->valid = false;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Don't remove address space of PCI_NO_PASID which is created for PCI
> +     * sub-system.
> +     */
> +    if (vtd_as->pasid == PCI_NO_PASID) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * For a PASID cache invalidation, this function handles below scenarios:
> + * a) a present cached pasid entry needs to be removed
> + * b) a present cached pasid entry needs to be updated
> + */
> +static void vtd_pasid_cache_sync(IntelIOMMUState *s, VTDPASIDCacheInfo *pc_info)
> +{
> +    if (!s->flts || !s->root_scalable || !s->dmar_enabled) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    vtd_iommu_lock(s);
> +    /*
> +     * a,b): loop all the existing vtd_as instances for pasid cache removal
> +       or update.
> +     */
> +    g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->vtd_address_spaces, vtd_flush_pasid_locked,
> +                                pc_info);
> +    vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
> +}
> +
> +static bool vtd_process_pasid_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> +                                   VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
> +{
> +    uint16_t did;
> +    uint32_t pasid;
> +    VTDPASIDCacheInfo pc_info;
> +    uint64_t mask[4] = {VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_RSVD_VAL0, VTD_INV_DESC_ALL_ONE,
> +                        VTD_INV_DESC_ALL_ONE, VTD_INV_DESC_ALL_ONE};
> +
> +    if (!vtd_inv_desc_reserved_check(s, inv_desc, mask, true,
> +                                     __func__, "pasid cache inv")) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +
> +    did = VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_DID(inv_desc);
> +    pasid = VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_PASID(inv_desc);
> +
> +    switch (VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G(inv_desc)) {
> +    case VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G_DSI:
> +        trace_vtd_pasid_cache_dsi(did);
> +        pc_info.type = VTD_PASID_CACHE_DOMSI;
> +        pc_info.did = did;
> +        break;
> +
> +    case VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G_PASID_SI:
> +        /* PASID selective implies a DID selective */
> +        trace_vtd_pasid_cache_psi(did, pasid);
> +        pc_info.type = VTD_PASID_CACHE_PASIDSI;
> +        pc_info.did = did;
> +        pc_info.pasid = pasid;
> +        break;
> +
> +    case VTD_INV_DESC_PASIDC_G_GLOBAL:
> +        trace_vtd_pasid_cache_gsi();
> +        pc_info.type = VTD_PASID_CACHE_GLOBAL_INV;
> +        break;
> +
> +    default:
> +        error_report_once("invalid granularity field in PASID-cache invalidate "
> +                          "descriptor, hi: 0x%"PRIx64" lo: 0x%" PRIx64,
> +                           inv_desc->val[1], inv_desc->val[0]);
what's the point of printing the 2nd 64b? Looking at Figure 6-2 in the
spec (6.5.2.2. PASID-cache invalidate descriptor) it does not seem to
contain anything?

Besides I read in the spec:
Domain-ID (DID): The DID field indicates the target domain-id. Hardware
ignores bits 31:(16+N), where N is the domain-id width reported in the
Capability Register.

How do you make sure N is same on both pIOMMU and vIOMMU?


> +        return false;
> +    }
> +
> +    vtd_pasid_cache_sync(s, &pc_info);
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
>  static bool vtd_process_inv_iec_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>                                       VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
>  {
> @@ -3274,6 +3451,13 @@ static bool vtd_process_inv_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s)
>          }
>          break;
>  
> +    case VTD_INV_DESC_PC:
> +        trace_vtd_inv_desc("pasid-cache", inv_desc.val[1], inv_desc.val[0]);
same here
> +        if (!vtd_process_pasid_desc(s, &inv_desc)) {
> +            return false;
> +        }
> +        break;
> +
>      case VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB:
>          trace_vtd_inv_desc("p-iotlb", inv_desc.val[1], inv_desc.val[0]);
>          if (!vtd_process_piotlb_desc(s, &inv_desc)) {
> @@ -3309,16 +3493,6 @@ static bool vtd_process_inv_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s)
>          }
>          break;
>  
> -    /*
> -     * TODO: the entity of below two cases will be implemented in future series.
> -     * To make guest (which integrates scalable mode support patch set in
> -     * iommu driver) work, just return true is enough so far.
> -     */
> -    case VTD_INV_DESC_PC:
> -        if (s->scalable_mode) {
> -            break;
> -        }
> -    /* fallthrough */
>      default:
>          error_report_once("%s: invalid inv desc: hi=%"PRIx64", lo=%"PRIx64
>                            " (unknown type)", __func__, inv_desc.hi,
> diff --git a/hw/i386/trace-events b/hw/i386/trace-events
> index ac9e1a10aa..ae5bbfcdc0 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/i386/trace-events
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ vtd_inv_qi_head(uint16_t head) "read head %d"
>  vtd_inv_qi_tail(uint16_t head) "write tail %d"
>  vtd_inv_qi_fetch(void) ""
>  vtd_context_cache_reset(void) ""
> +vtd_pasid_cache_gsi(void) ""
> +vtd_pasid_cache_dsi(uint16_t domain) "Domain selective PC invalidation domain 0x%"PRIx16
> +vtd_pasid_cache_psi(uint16_t domain, uint32_t pasid) "PASID selective PC invalidation domain 0x%"PRIx16" pasid 0x%"PRIx32
>  vtd_re_not_present(uint8_t bus) "Root entry bus %"PRIu8" not present"
>  vtd_ce_not_present(uint8_t bus, uint8_t devfn) "Context entry bus %"PRIu8" devfn %"PRIu8" not present"
>  vtd_iotlb_page_hit(uint16_t sid, uint64_t addr, uint64_t slpte, uint16_t domain) "IOTLB page hit sid 0x%"PRIx16" iova 0x%"PRIx64" slpte 0x%"PRIx64" domain 0x%"PRIx16
Besides the code looks good to me

Eric



  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-27 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 113+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-22  6:40 [PATCH v5 00/21] intel_iommu: Enable stage-1 translation for passthrough device Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/21] intel_iommu: Rename vtd_ce_get_rid2pasid_entry to vtd_ce_get_pasid_entry Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 22:19   ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-08-25  6:01     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/21] hw/pci: Introduce pci_device_get_viommu_cap() Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 22:22   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 11:13   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-27 11:22     ` Eric Auger
2025-08-27 12:30       ` Yi Liu
2025-08-27 12:32         ` Eric Auger
2025-08-27 15:30           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28  8:26             ` Yi Liu
2025-08-28  9:06               ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  1:54                 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  3:26                   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-01  2:35                     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-01  2:59                       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-01  3:31                         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/21] intel_iommu: Implement get_viommu_cap() callback Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 22:23   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/21] vfio: Introduce helper vfio_pci_from_vfio_device() Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 22:40   ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-08-25  6:06     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27 11:13   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-27 11:34   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-01 16:36   ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-02  2:12     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/21] vfio/iommufd: Force creating nested parent domain Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 23:12   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-25  8:28     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27 11:51       ` Eric Auger
2025-08-27 11:48   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-28  9:53     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-28 13:00       ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  1:40         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  3:47           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/21] hw/pci: Export pci_device_get_iommu_bus_devfn() and return bool Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 23:13   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 11:14   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/21] intel_iommu: Introduce a new structure VTDHostIOMMUDevice Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 23:17   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-26 17:21   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27  6:45     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27  8:51       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 16:36     ` Eric Auger
2025-08-27 16:57       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 11:14   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-28  9:17     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  2:57       ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/21] intel_iommu: Check for compatibility with IOMMUFD backed device when x-flts=on Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 11:42   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-28  9:37     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27 11:55   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/21] intel_iommu: Fail passthrough device under PCI bridge if x-flts=on Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 10:33   ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  5:14     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/21] intel_iommu: Introduce two helpers vtd_as_from/to_iommu_pasid_locked Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 11:36   ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  5:33     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-03  6:30       ` Yi Liu
2025-09-03  7:13         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 11/21] intel_iommu: Handle PASID entry removal and update Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 14:25   ` Eric Auger [this message]
2025-09-01  3:17     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-28 12:05   ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  3:31     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-03  7:58       ` Yi Liu
2025-09-04  2:37         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 12/21] intel_iommu: Handle PASID entry addition Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 16:22   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-01  9:03     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-03  8:52       ` Yi Liu
2025-09-04  2:45         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  5:46   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 13/21] intel_iommu: Introduce a new pasid cache invalidation type FORCE_RESET Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 16:28   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  5:56     ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  9:04     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 14/21] intel_iommu: Stick to system MR for IOMMUFD backed host device when x-fls=on Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 17:14   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  6:06   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 15/21] intel_iommu: Bind/unbind guest page table to host Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28  8:37   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  7:05   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 16/21] intel_iommu: Replay pasid bindings after context cache invalidation Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28  9:43   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  7:35     ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  8:11       ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-03 10:18         ` Yi Liu
2025-09-04  6:42           ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 17/21] intel_iommu: Propagate PASID-based iotlb invalidation to host Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 10:00   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-28 12:11     ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  8:32     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 18/21] intel_iommu: Replay all pasid bindings when either SRTP or TE bit is changed Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 10:02   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 19/21] vfio: Add a new element bypass_ro in VFIOContainerBase Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 12:47   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 20/21] Workaround for ERRATA_772415_SPR17 Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 23:55   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-25  9:21     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-25 16:58       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27  7:11         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27  8:42           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 11:56     ` Yi Liu
2025-08-27 15:09       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-29  8:16         ` Yi Liu
2025-08-29  8:54           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 21/21] intel_iommu: Enable host device when x-flts=on in scalable mode Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 12:51   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  7:42   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-27 11:13 ` [PATCH v5 00/21] intel_iommu: Enable stage-1 translation for passthrough device Yi Liu
2025-08-28  5:53   ` Duan, Zhenzhong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c150f38-6404-4b1b-912b-8f39658081f1@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
    --cc=clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).