From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Python 3.5 EOL; when can require 3.6?
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:39:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c357394-dcb8-a400-067e-ced08ad48022@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871rj0o1yk.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On 17/09/2020 17.30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 16/09/2020 16.00, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 16/09/2020 14.30, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 08:43, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> We require Python 3.5. It will reach its "end of life" at the end of
>>>>> September 2020[*]. Any reason not to require 3.6 for 5.2? qemu-iotests
>>>>> already does for its Python parts.
>>> [...]
>>>> The default should be
>>>> "leave the version dependency where it is", not "bump the version
>>>> dependency as soon as we can".
>>>
>>> OTOH, if none of our supported build systems uses python 3.5 by default
>>> anymore, it also will not get tested anymore, so bugs might creep in,
>>> which will of course end up in a bad experience for the users, too, that
>>> still try to build with such an old version. So limiting the version to
>>> the level that we also test is IMHO very reasonable.
>>>
>>> Let's have a look at the (older) systems that we support and the python
>>> versions according to repology.org:
>>>
>>> - RHEL7 / CentOS 7 : 3.6.8
>>> - Ubuntu 18.04 (Bionic) : >= 3.6.5
>>> - openSUSE Leap 15.0 : >= 3.6.5
>>> - OpenBSD Ports : >= 3.7.9
>>> - FreeBSD Ports : >= 3.5.10 - but there is also 3.6 or newer
>>> - Homebrew : >= 3.7.9
>>>
>>> ... so I think it should be fine to retire 3.5 nowadays.
>>
>> Sorry, I forgot to check Debian. If I got that right, Debian 9 still
>> uses Python 3.5 by default. So I guess that means we can not deprecate
>> Python 3.5 yet?
>
> Discussed before:
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] qapi: Fix code generation with Python 3.5
> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:54:18 +0100
> Message-ID: <87lfq5s19h.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-01/msg03855.html
>
> Short version: Debian != Debian LTS. We support Debian until EOL, not
> LTS. Debian 9 reached EOL in July.
Ok, so could you please add a remark to docs/system/build-platforms.rst
that states that we do not support Debian LTS ... otherwise I guess we
will have discussion again once Debian 10 reaches its EOL.
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 7:43 Python 3.5 EOL; when can require 3.6? Markus Armbruster
2020-09-16 7:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-16 8:02 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:16 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-16 13:53 ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-16 13:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 14:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-16 8:22 ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-16 15:09 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-16 7:54 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 9:50 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 9:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 9:55 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 12:30 ` Peter Maydell
2020-09-16 13:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-09-16 14:00 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 14:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 14:57 ` John Snow
2020-09-17 14:10 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 14:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 15:24 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 15:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 15:41 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 15:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-09-17 15:39 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2020-09-17 15:42 ` Warner Losh
2020-09-17 16:07 ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-17 16:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 17:02 ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-17 16:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-17 16:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 16:50 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c357394-dcb8-a400-067e-ced08ad48022@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).