Re: [PATCH] docs/system/s390x: Add a chapter about s390x boot devices

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>]

On 8/10/20 12:29 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:20:53 +0200
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/10/20 12:18 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Thu,  6 Aug 2020 17:05:07 +0200
>>> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Booting on s390x is a little bit different compared to other architectures.
>>>> Let's add some information for people who are not yet used to this.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  docs/system/target-s390x.rst      |  1 +
>>>>  2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst b/docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000000..68f0ffd450
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
>>>> +Boot devices on s390x
>>>> +=====================
>>>> +
>>>> +Booting with bootindex parameter
>>>> +--------------------------------
>>>> +
>>>> +For classical mainframe guests (i.e. LPAR or z/VM installations), you always
>>>> +have to exactly specify the disk where you want to boot from (or "IPL" from,  
>>>
>>> s/exactly/explictly/ ?  
>>
>> Or "to explicit the disk ..."?
> 
> Hm, not sure what that means?

Sorry I thought it was a verb, but the verb is explicitize.

"to explicitly specify" sounds good (typo fixed).