From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:27:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c763ebf-d11e-f414-a2cf-f7117ea6d4fb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1013114653.3661277.1496219327691.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On 31/05/2017 11:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Ok before I move on let's see whether this is what we want...
>>
>> - firstly, find all machine types:
>>
>> pxdev:qemu [edu-fix]# grep -R ".parent = TYPE_MACHINE" * | wc
>> 49 196 2269
>>
>> so now we have 49 kinds of machines.
>>
>> - rename msi_nonbroken into msi_broken, then:
>>
>> - x86/arm/spapr/s390 machines are the only ones that don't need to
>> set msi_broken since they support MSI and have msi_nonbroken set,
>> either in board init function or in irq chip init function
>>
>> - for all the rest of the machines, I should add "msi_broken" in its
>> machine init() function.
>>
>> Is this really what we want?
> No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken. When someone
> reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken".
Hi,
I agree with the direction, but I am concerned msi_nonbroken is there
for a reason.
We might break some (obscure/not in use) machine.
Maybe we should CC all arch machine maintainers/contributors to give
them a chance
to object...
Thanks,
Marcel
> Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-15 13:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init() Peter Xu
2017-05-29 6:08 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-29 9:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-29 10:13 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-29 12:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-30 9:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-30 14:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-30 14:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-31 7:03 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-31 7:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-31 8:26 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-31 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-31 8:55 ` Peter Xu
2017-06-01 8:27 ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2017-06-01 14:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-01 19:22 ` Aurelien Jarno
2017-06-01 22:06 ` Paul Burton
2017-06-02 4:18 ` Peter Xu
2017-06-02 7:47 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c763ebf-d11e-f414-a2cf-f7117ea6d4fb@redhat.com \
--to=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).