From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Qqs-0006mS-67 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 20:32:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Qqr-0007yP-DF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 20:32:38 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:52385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Qqr-0007xg-54 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 20:32:37 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id f65so14091885wma.2 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 17:32:37 -0800 (PST) References: <20190309004826.9027-1-lersek@redhat.com> <20190309004826.9027-7-lersek@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <2d33be0b-aa53-2038-01b0-0afed368aea8@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 02:32:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190309004826.9027-7-lersek@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/10] roms/Makefile: replace the $(EFIROM) target with "edk2-basetools" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek , berrange@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Laszlo, On 3/9/19 1:48 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > We don't (can't) have a recipe for building just $(EFIROM); therefore, > while we call the target $(EFIROM), we actually build all of the edk2 > BaseTools. Rename the target to edk2-basetools, and update the iPXE > prerequisite accordingly. This will let other targets depend on > "edk2-basetools", where an $(EFIROM) pre-requisite would be misleading. > > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek > --- > roms/Makefile | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/roms/Makefile b/roms/Makefile > index 78d5dd18c301..2e83ececa25a 100644 > --- a/roms/Makefile > +++ b/roms/Makefile > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ pxe-rom-%: build-pxe-roms > > efirom: $(patsubst %,efi-rom-%,$(pxerom_variants)) > > -efi-rom-%: build-pxe-roms build-efi-roms $(EFIROM) > +efi-rom-%: build-pxe-roms build-efi-roms edk2-basetools > $(EFIROM) -f "0x$(VID)" -i "0x$(DID)" -l 0x02 \ > -b ipxe/src/bin/$(VID)$(DID).rom \ > -ec ipxe/src/bin-i386-efi/$(VID)$(DID).efidrv \ > @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ build-efi-roms: build-pxe-roms > $(patsubst %,bin-i386-efi/%.efidrv,$(pxerom_targets)) \ > $(patsubst %,bin-x86_64-efi/%.efidrv,$(pxerom_targets)) > > -$(EFIROM): > +edk2-basetools: Should we add: $(MAKE) -f Makefile.edk2 submodules from your next patch? There might be a circular dependency else, if the user doesn't init the submodules manually. The next patch add a make dependency 'efi' -> 'edk2-basetools', but 'edk2-basetools' build the BaseTools within edk2/. > $(MAKE) -C edk2/BaseTools > > slof: >